Raymond Wacks
Impact in
- Law top 1%
- Judicial and Constitutional Studies
- Law in Society and Culture
- Freedom of Expression and Defamation
- Legal Studies and Policies
Papers in
-
- Privacy, Security, and Data Protection 7
- Law, Rights, and Freedoms 5
- Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics 2
- Law 10
- Freedom of Expression and Defamation 4
- Judicial and Constitutional Studies 2
- Journals
- Media Asia (1 paper)Computer law & security review (1 paper)The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (4 papers)Hart Publishing eBooks (2 papers)Hong Kong University Press eBooks (3 papers)
In The Last Decade
Raymond Wacks
28 papers receiving 168 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Law 91
- Political Science and International Relations 67
- Sociology and Political Science 102
- Communication 13
- Public Administration 4
Countries citing papers authored by Raymond Wacks
This map shows the geographic impact of Raymond Wacks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Raymond Wacks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Raymond Wacks more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Raymond Wacks
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Raymond Wacks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Raymond Wacks. The network helps show where Raymond Wacks may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 2 scholars most cited alongside Raymond Wacks, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2010 | 34 | |
| 2 | Understanding Jurisprudence: An Introduction to Legal Theory | 2005 | 26 |
| 3 | Hong Kong, China and 1997 : essays in legal theory | 1993 | 18 |
| 4 | 1999 | 18 | |
| 5 | 2006 | 13 | |
| 6 | 2009 | 11 | |
| 7 | Civil liberties in Hong Kong | 1988 | 10 |
| 8 | Human rights in Hong Kong | 1992 | 9 |
| 9 | 2015 | 9 | |
| 10 | 2010 | 8 | |
| 11 | Privacy and press freedom | 1995 | 7 |
| 12 | 2013 | 7 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 5 | |
| 14 | 2015 | 4 | |
| 15 | 2014 | 4 | |
| 16 | 2012 | 4 | |
| 17 | Our Flagging Rights | 2000 | 3 |
| 18 | 2008 | 3 | |
| 19 | 2019 | 3 | |
| 20 | Hong Kong data privacy law : territorial regulation in a borderless world | 2003 | 2 |
About Raymond Wacks
Raymond Wacks is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Law, Political Science and International Relations, Artificial Intelligence and Marketing, having authored 35 papers that have together received 210 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Privacy, Security, and Data Protection (7 papers), Law, Rights, and Freedoms (5 papers), Freedom of Expression and Defamation (4 papers), Judicial and Constitutional Studies (2 papers), Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting (2 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (2 papers), Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics (2 papers) and European Criminal Justice and Data Protection (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Law (91 citations), Political Science and International Relations (67 citations), Sociology and Political Science (102 citations), Communication (13 citations) and Public Administration (4 citations). Raymond Wacks has collaborated with scholars based in Hong Kong and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Andrew Byrnes and Johannes Chan. Their work appears in journals such as Media Asia, Computer law & security review, The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong), Hart Publishing eBooks and Hong Kong University Press eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.