Ray E. Tucker

1.0k citations
59 papers · 825 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Ray E. Tucker

56 papers receiving 695 citations

Peers

Ray E. Tucker
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 365
  • Animal Science and Zoology 185
  • Small Animals 76
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 140
  • Biochemistry 42
Replace E. W. Crampton with:
E. W. Crampton Canada
R. J. Emerick United States
Wise Burroughs United States
I. A. Dyer United States
N. Jackson United Kingdom
D. A. Christensen Canada
N. S. Wilkinson United States
Sung Sill Lee South Korea
MIRJANA FENTON Canada
D. I. H. Jones United Kingdom
Ray E. Tucker relative to E. W. Crampton Canada E. W. Crampton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×10×
E. W. Crampton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ray E. Tucker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ray E. Tucker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ray E. Tucker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ray E. Tucker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ray E. Tucker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ray E. Tucker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ray E. Tucker. The network helps show where Ray E. Tucker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ray E. Tucker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ray E. Tucker Line = papers co-authored together Ray E. Tucker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 59 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197259
2 196854
3 199347
4 197943
5 197141
6 198236
7 198935
8 197327
9 197927
10 197224
11 198023
12 197322
13 197419
14 197219
15 199219
16 198118
17 198616
18 198515
19 197415
20 197615

About Ray E. Tucker

Ray E. Tucker is a scholar working on Agronomy and Crop Science, Animal Science and Zoology, Small Animals, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Nutrition and Dietetics, having authored 59 papers that have together received 825 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (17 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (16 papers), Plant and fungal interactions (7 papers), Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (6 papers), Rabbits: Nutrition, Reproduction, Health (6 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (4 papers), Plant Toxicity and Pharmacological Properties (4 papers) and Animal health and immunology (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Agronomy and Crop Science (365 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (185 citations), Small Animals (76 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (140 citations) and Biochemistry (42 citations). Ray E. Tucker has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include George E. Mitchell, Charles Oran Little, Alastair McLean, Gerald T. Schelling, J. P. Fontenot, Walter D. Willms, Carl E. Polan, G. L. Newton, James A. Boling and Richard G. Powell. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Animal Science, Journal of Nutrition, Journal of Dairy Science, Drug and Chemical Toxicology and Canadian Journal of Animal Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact