Ratnakar Dash

3.3k citations
119 papers · 2.3k · h-index 26

Impact in

Papers in

Ratnakar Dash

107 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

Ratnakar Dash
Comparison fields: 5 of 140
  • Neurology 539
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 827
  • Media Technology 272
  • Artificial Intelligence 934
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 389
Replace Wei Huang with:
Wei Huang China
Serestina Viriri South Africa
Lihong Zheng Australia
Jakub Nalepa Poland
Khurram Khurshid Pakistan
Davut Hanbay Türkiye
Chih‐Cheng Hung United States
Sotirios A. Tsaftaris United Kingdom
Michał Kawulok Poland
Ratnakar Dash relative to Wei Huang China Wei Huang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Wei Huang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ratnakar Dash

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ratnakar Dash's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ratnakar Dash with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ratnakar Dash more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ratnakar Dash

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ratnakar Dash. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ratnakar Dash. The network helps show where Ratnakar Dash may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ratnakar Dash, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ratnakar Dash Line = papers co-authored together Ratnakar Dash links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 119 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007210
2 2015204
3 2014162
4 2018143
5 2021117
6 2020110
7 201961
8 202057
9 201756
10 201353
11 202152
12 202450
13 202048
14 201946
15 201743
16 201642
17 201839
18 201735
19 199135
20 201635

About Ratnakar Dash

Ratnakar Dash is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Artificial Intelligence, Media Technology, Neurology and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 119 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Brain Tumor Detection and Classification (23 papers), Machine Learning and ELM (17 papers), Network Security and Intrusion Detection (13 papers), Image and Signal Denoising Methods (12 papers), AI in cancer detection (12 papers), Remote Sensing and Land Use (11 papers), Advanced Image Processing Techniques (11 papers) and Remote-Sensing Image Classification (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (539 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (827 citations), Media Technology (272 citations), Artificial Intelligence (934 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (389 citations). Ratnakar Dash has collaborated with scholars based in India, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Banshidhar Majhi, Deepak Ranjan Nayak, Debendra Muduli, Kshira Sagar Sahoo, Bibhudatta Sahoo, Dillip Kumar Swain, P. Krishnan, S. K. Nayak, Mayank Tiwary and Joel J. P. C. Rodrigues. Their work appears in journals such as Multimedia Tools and Applications, Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, Neurocomputing, Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems and Computers & Electrical Engineering.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact