Raquel Thomas
Impact in
-
- Species Distribution and Climate Change
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Papers in
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies 3
-
- Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management 3
- Forest Management and Policy 1
- Co-authors
- Daniel Sabatier (2 shared papers)Anthony Di Fiore (2 shared papers)Milton Aulestia (2 shared papers)David Neill (2 shared papers)Roderick Zagt (2 shared papers)Edwin Pos (2 shared papers)Jean‐François Molino (2 shared papers)Roosevelt García‐Villacorta (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Ecology and Evolution (2 papers)Journal of Applied Ecology (1 paper)The International Forestry Review (1 paper)Open Research Online (The Open University) (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Raquel Thomas
5 papers receiving 35 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 25
- Ecological Modeling 9
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 20
- Oceanography 10
- Ecology 16
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 10
Countries citing papers authored by Raquel Thomas
This map shows the geographic impact of Raquel Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Raquel Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Raquel Thomas more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Raquel Thomas
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Raquel Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Raquel Thomas. The network helps show where Raquel Thomas may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Raquel Thomas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2014 | 29 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 3 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 1 |
About Raquel Thomas
Raquel Thomas is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Finance, having authored 5 papers that have together received 39 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (3 papers), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (3 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (2 papers), Community Development and Social Impact (1 paper), Forest Management and Policy (1 paper), Species Distribution and Climate Change (1 paper), Economic and Environmental Valuation (1 paper) and Plant and animal studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (9 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (20 citations), Oceanography (10 citations), Ecology (16 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (10 citations). Raquel Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Daniel Sabatier, Anthony Di Fiore, Milton Aulestia, David Neill, Roderick Zagt, Edwin Pos, Jean‐François Molino, Roosevelt García‐Villacorta, Gonzalo Rivas‐Torres and Kenneth R. Young. Their work appears in journals such as Ecology and Evolution, Journal of Applied Ecology, The International Forestry Review and Open Research Online (The Open University).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.