Raquel Lemos

1.1k citations
33 papers · 532 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Raquel Lemos

30 papers receiving 525 citations

Peers

Raquel Lemos
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 183
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 112
  • Physiology 127
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 16
  • Neurology 38
Replace Ronald C. Petersen with:
Ronald C. Petersen United States
Ismael Luis Calandri Argentina
Matěj Škorvánek Slovakia
Daniel J. Myall New Zealand
Hyunjung Ahn South Korea
Sara Varanese Italy
Hana Marková Czechia
Anne‐Mette Hejl Denmark
Salvatore Caratozzolo Italy
Ece Bayram United States
Raquel Lemos relative to Ronald C. Petersen United States Ronald C. Petersen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Ronald C. Petersen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Raquel Lemos

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Raquel Lemos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Raquel Lemos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Raquel Lemos more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Raquel Lemos

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Raquel Lemos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Raquel Lemos. The network helps show where Raquel Lemos may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Raquel Lemos, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Raquel Lemos Line = papers co-authored together Raquel Lemos links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201661
2 201260
3 201256
4 201452
5 201451
6 200132
7 201229
8 201925
9 201525
10 201324
11 202219
12 201218
13 201516
14 20229
15 20148
16 20226
17
Adaptation study of the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test to the Portuguese population
20126
18 20156
19 20165
20 20225

About Raquel Lemos

Raquel Lemos is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Oncology, Physiology and Epidemiology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 532 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (14 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (4 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (4 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (3 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (2 papers), Face Recognition and Perception (2 papers), Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases (2 papers) and Memory and Neural Mechanisms (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (183 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (112 citations), Physiology (127 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (16 citations) and Neurology (38 citations). Raquel Lemos has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Isabel Santana, Mário R. Simões, Diana Duro, Beatriz Santiago, Miguel Castelo‐Branco, Liliana Letra, Miguel Tábuas‐Pereira, Catarina Cunha, Sandra Freitas and Sueli Marques. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Alzheimer s Disease, Neuroscience, Psychology and Health, Frontiers in Psychology and The Computer Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact