Raphaël Gellert

34 papers receiving 374 citations

Peers

Raphaël Gellert
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Safety Research 110
  • Law 131
  • Health Informatics 12
  • Sociology and Political Science 235
  • Political Science and International Relations 86
Replace Nadezhda Purtova with:
Nadezhda Purtova Netherlands
Orla Lynskey United Kingdom
Alessandro Mantelero Italy
Oskar Josef Gstrein Netherlands
Federico Casolari Italy
Chris Reed United Kingdom
Neil Richards United States
Margot E. Kaminski United States
Maria Helen Murphy Ireland
Benjamin Sturm Germany
Raphaël Gellert relative to Nadezhda Purtova Netherlands Nadezhda Purtova's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.8×
Nadezhda Purtova · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Raphaël Gellert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Raphaël Gellert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Raphaël Gellert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Raphaël Gellert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Raphaël Gellert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Raphaël Gellert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Raphaël Gellert. The network helps show where Raphaël Gellert may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Raphaël Gellert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Raphaël Gellert Line = papers co-authored together Raphaël Gellert links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201875
2 201658
3 201446
4 201344
5 202334
6 201225
7 201519
8 201215
9 201415
10 202014
11 201613
12 202012
13 201111
14
Understanding data protection as risk regulation
201511
15 20249
16
Precaution and privacy impact assessment as modes towards risk governance
20117
17 20206
18 20126
19 20175
20 20204

About Raphaël Gellert

Raphaël Gellert is a scholar working on Law, Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance and Safety Research, having authored 36 papers that have together received 451 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Privacy, Security, and Data Protection (18 papers), Digitalization, Law, and Regulation (7 papers), European Criminal Justice and Data Protection (7 papers), Criminal Law and Evidence (6 papers), Digital Transformation in Law (4 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (3 papers), Law, AI, and Intellectual Property (3 papers) and Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (110 citations), Law (131 citations), Health Informatics (12 citations), Sociology and Political Science (235 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (86 citations). Raphaël Gellert has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Belgium and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Serge Gutwirth, Kjetil Rommetveit, Niels van Dijk, Tamar Sharon, Michaël Friedewald, Gloria González Fuster, David G. Wright, Emilio Mordini, Rachel L. Finn and Paul De Hert. Their work appears in journals such as International Data Privacy Law, Regulation & Governance, Surveillance & Society, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine and Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact