Raphael Demos
Impact in
- Philosophy top 2%
- Classical Philosophy and Thought
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Study and Philosophy of Religion
Papers in
- Philosophy 20
- Classical Philosophy and Thought 11
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory 5
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 4
- Philosophy and Historical Thought 2
-
- Philosophy, Science, and History 2
- Co-authors
- Paul J. Tillich (1 shared paper)Anthony D. Woozley (1 shared paper)Rod Cross (1 shared paper)Ashley Montagu (1 shared paper)James Bryant Conant (1 shared paper)Gilbert Ryle (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Journal of Philosophy (5 papers)Philosophy and Phenomenological Research (4 papers)Mind (2 papers)The Philosophical Review (2 papers)Journal of the History of Ideas (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Raphael Demos
18 papers receiving 172 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
- Philosophy 149
- General Decision Sciences 5
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 24
- Theoretical Computer Science 2
- Social Psychology 20
Countries citing papers authored by Raphael Demos
This map shows the geographic impact of Raphael Demos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Raphael Demos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Raphael Demos more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Raphael Demos
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Raphael Demos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Raphael Demos. The network helps show where Raphael Demos may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside Raphael Demos, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1960 | 91 | |
| 2 | 1964 | 49 | |
| 3 | 1966 | 18 | |
| 4 | 1968 | 17 | |
| 5 | 1952 | 16 | |
| 6 | 1958 | 8 | |
| 7 | 1963 | 8 | |
| 8 | 1952 | 7 | |
| 9 | 1957 | 6 | |
| 10 | 1964 | 3 | |
| 11 | 1953 | 2 | |
| 12 | Some Reflections on Threats and Punishments | 1957 | 2 |
| 13 | 1958 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2016 | 2 | |
| 15 | 1957 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1959 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1961 | 1 | |
| 18 | 1961 | 1 | |
| 19 | 1967 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1967 | 1 |
About Raphael Demos
Raphael Demos is a scholar working on Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cultural Studies and Law, having authored 22 papers that have together received 238 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Philosophy and Thought (11 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (5 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (4 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (2 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (2 papers), Philosophy and Historical Thought (2 papers), Criminal Law and Policy (1 paper) and Psychoanalysis and Social Critique (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (149 citations), General Decision Sciences (5 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (24 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (2 citations) and Social Psychology (20 citations). Raphael Demos has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Paul J. Tillich, Anthony D. Woozley, Rod Cross, Ashley Montagu, James Bryant Conant and Gilbert Ryle. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Philosophy, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Mind, The Philosophical Review and Journal of the History of Ideas.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.