Randolph Penning

63 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Randolph Penning
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
  • Rehabilitation 252
  • Toxicology 83
  • Emergency Medicine 181
  • Archeology 192
  • Virology 73
Replace John E. Hoopes with:
John E. Hoopes United States
Rodney P. R. Dawber United Kingdom
Robert C. Russell United States
Henry H. Chan Hong Kong
Meir Nyska Israel
José Roberto Pereira Lauris Brazil
Károly Balogh United States
Jack Chung-Kai Yu United States
Sean W. Lanigan United Kingdom
Joel L. Cohen United States
Randolph Penning relative to John E. Hoopes United States John E. Hoopes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×32×
John E. Hoopes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Randolph Penning

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Randolph Penning's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Randolph Penning with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Randolph Penning more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Randolph Penning

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Randolph Penning. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Randolph Penning. The network helps show where Randolph Penning may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Randolph Penning, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Randolph Penning Line = papers co-authored together Randolph Penning links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 70 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001221
2 2000138
3
Aortic endothelium in HIV-1 infection: chronic injury, activation, and increased leukocyte adherence.
1996100
4 201584
5 199268
6 200161
7 201956
8 201450
9 199349
10 199249
11 199348
12 199647
13 200945
14 200344
15 200641
16 199336
17 201134
18 201134
19 199233
20 199233

About Randolph Penning

Randolph Penning is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Emergency Medicine, Immunology and Allergy, Toxicology and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 70 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wound Healing and Treatments (10 papers), Cell Adhesion Molecules Research (6 papers), Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (5 papers), Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (5 papers), Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes (5 papers), Surgical Sutures and Adhesives (4 papers), Medical and Health Sciences Research (4 papers) and Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (252 citations), Toxicology (83 citations), Emergency Medicine (181 citations), Archeology (192 citations) and Virology (73 citations). Randolph Penning has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Austria. Frequent co-authors include P. Betz, Andreas Büttner, Gita Mall, Michael L. Nerlich, Wolfgang Eisenmenger, Serge Weis, J. Wilske, Matthias Graw, Michael Hubig and Jutta Tuebel. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Legal Medicine, Forensic Science International, Vaccine, Journal of Forensic Sciences and Infection.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact