Rachel E. Pepper

27 papers receiving 551 citations

Peers

Rachel E. Pepper
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films 86
  • Condensed Matter Physics 124
  • Media Technology 76
  • Computational Mechanics 117
  • Education 163
Replace Suzanne Amador Kane with:
Suzanne Amador Kane United States
Chenyi Fei United States
Michael Grove United Kingdom
Orit Peleg United States
Gabriel Juárez United States
William Gilpin United States
Hangjian Ling United States
Xiaohui Zhang China
Alessandro Rapini Brazil
Mark Paetkau Canada
Rachel E. Pepper relative to Suzanne Amador Kane United States Suzanne Amador Kane's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×28.7×
Suzanne Amador Kane · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Rachel E. Pepper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rachel E. Pepper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rachel E. Pepper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rachel E. Pepper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rachel E. Pepper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rachel E. Pepper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rachel E. Pepper. The network helps show where Rachel E. Pepper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Rachel E. Pepper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Rachel E. Pepper Line = papers co-authored together Rachel E. Pepper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200889
2 201280
3 201366
4 200866
5 200947
6 201636
7 201027
8 201325
9 201224
10 201017
11 201517
12 201216
13 201213
14 201212
15 202111
16 20138
17 20128
18 20234
19
Not plants or animals: The protection of Indigenous cultural heritage in NSW
20143
20 20123

About Rachel E. Pepper

Rachel E. Pepper is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Media Technology, Education, Biomedical Engineering and Computational Mechanics, having authored 29 papers that have together received 583 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Experimental Learning in Engineering (7 papers), Micro and Nano Robotics (7 papers), Science Education and Pedagogy (5 papers), Innovative Teaching Methods (4 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer (3 papers), Biocrusts and Microbial Ecology (3 papers), Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies (3 papers) and Experimental and Theoretical Physics Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Surfaces, Coatings and Films (86 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (124 citations), Media Technology (76 citations), Computational Mechanics (117 citations) and Education (163 citations). Rachel E. Pepper has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Howard A. Stone, Marcus Roper, Steven J. Pollock, Stephanie V. Chasteen, Katherine K. Perkins, Laurent Courbin, Sangjin Ryu, M. A. R. Koehl, Michael P. Brenner and Mark J. Dayel. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of The Royal Society Interface, Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, Physics of Fluids, Marine Biology and Physical Review Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact