Rachel E. Lean

28 papers receiving 577 citations

Peers

Rachel E. Lean
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 453
  • Pharmacy 38
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 39
  • Clinical Psychology 113
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 18
Replace Nikk Conneman with:
Nikk Conneman Netherlands
Elaine Healy Ireland
Leigh Davis Australia
Andrew Powls United Kingdom
Malika Delobel‐Ayoub France
Anne L. Rickards Australia
Adam J. Grieve United States
Nisha C. Brown Australia
Rie Akaho Japan
Richard H. Thompson United States
Rachel E. Lean relative to Nikk Conneman Netherlands Nikk Conneman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.6×
Nikk Conneman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Rachel E. Lean

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rachel E. Lean's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rachel E. Lean with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rachel E. Lean more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rachel E. Lean

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rachel E. Lean. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rachel E. Lean. The network helps show where Rachel E. Lean may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Rachel E. Lean, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Rachel E. Lean Line = papers co-authored together Rachel E. Lean links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201882
2 201877
3 201854
4 202249
5 201741
6 202233
7 201930
8 201929
9 202225
10 201723
11 202021
12 201318
13 201914
14 202414
15 202413
16 202013
17 201712
18 20226
19 20245
20 20224

About Rachel E. Lean

Rachel E. Lean is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Pharmacy, having authored 32 papers that have together received 580 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Infant Development and Preterm Care (19 papers), Neonatal and fetal brain pathology (17 papers), Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (9 papers), Infant Health and Development (5 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (5 papers), Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (4 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (4 papers) and Language Development and Disorders (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (453 citations), Pharmacy (38 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (39 citations), Clinical Psychology (113 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (18 citations). Rachel E. Lean has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Cynthia Rogers, Christopher D. Smyser, Rachel Paul, Tara A. Smyser, Emily D. Gerstein, Muriah D. Wheelock, Deanna M. Barch, Joshua S. Shimony, Lianne J. Woodward and Barbara Warner. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Pediatrics, Biological Psychiatry, NeuroImage Clinical, Journal of Perinatology and Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact