Rachel Applegate
Impact in
- Library and Information Sciences top 0.2%
- Library Science and Information Literacy
- Library Science and Administration
- Information Systems top 5%
- Web and Library Services
- Library Collection Development and Digital Resources
Papers in
-
- Library Science and Information Literacy 14
- Library Science and Administration 7
-
- Web and Library Services 6
- Library Collection Development and Digital Resources 2
Rachel Applegate
24 papers receiving 342 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
- Library and Information Sciences 229
- Information Systems 197
- Information Systems and Management 31
- Education 85
- Leadership and Management 3
Countries citing papers authored by Rachel Applegate
This map shows the geographic impact of Rachel Applegate's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rachel Applegate with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rachel Applegate more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Rachel Applegate
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rachel Applegate. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rachel Applegate. The network helps show where Rachel Applegate may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 3 scholars most cited alongside Rachel Applegate, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2009 | 100 | |
| 2 | 2012 | 71 | |
| 3 | Whose Decline? Which Academic Libraries Are "Deserted" in Terms of Reference Transactions? | 2008 | 41 |
| 4 | Models of User Satisfaction: Understanding False Positives | 1993 | 41 |
| 5 | 2010 | 26 | |
| 6 | 2008 | 24 | |
| 7 | 1993 | 24 | |
| 8 | 2008 | 14 | |
| 9 | 2008 | 10 | |
| 10 | 2009 | 9 | |
| 11 | 2006 | 9 | |
| 12 | 2007 | 8 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 7 | |
| 14 | 2010 | 5 | |
| 15 | 2006 | 5 | |
| 16 | 2019 | 5 | |
| 17 | 1997 | 5 | |
| 18 | User satisfaction with information services : a test of the disconfirmation-satisfaction model with a library OPAC | 1995 | 4 |
| 19 | Evaluation of library services | 2006 | 3 |
| 20 | Designing Comprehensive Assessment Plans: The Big Picture Leads to the Little Picture | 2009 | 3 |
About Rachel Applegate
Rachel Applegate is a scholar working on Library and Information Sciences, Information Systems, Education, Information Systems and Management and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 25 papers that have together received 424 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Library Science and Information Literacy (14 papers), Library Science and Administration (7 papers), Web and Library Services (6 papers), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (3 papers), Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (2 papers), Management and Marketing Education (2 papers), Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (2 papers) and Evaluation of Teaching Practices (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Library and Information Sciences (229 citations), Information Systems (197 citations), Information Systems and Management (31 citations), Education (85 citations) and Leadership and Management (3 citations). Rachel Applegate has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Russia. Frequent co-authors include K Schilling, Kathy Johnson and Robert Mackoy. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Academic Librarianship, Library trends, Reference & User Services Quarterly, Journal of the Medical Library Association JMLA and Library & Information Science Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.