Rabia Tehseen

471 citations
15 papers · 235 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Rabia Tehseen

14 papers receiving 228 citations

Peers

Rabia Tehseen
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 67
  • Artificial Intelligence 85
  • Computer Science Applications 14
  • Geophysics 33
  • Health Information Management 5
Replace Michael Johnson with:
Michael Johnson United States
Muhaini Othman Malaysia
Kevin Boone United States
Leonardo Vidal Batista Brazil
Silvia Mabel Castro Argentina
Borhan Samei United States
Sohail Masood Bhatti Pakistan
Daniel Cheng Canada
Erica Briscoe United States
Stelios Andreadis Greece
Rabia Tehseen relative to Michael Johnson United States Michael Johnson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.4×
Michael Johnson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Rabia Tehseen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rabia Tehseen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rabia Tehseen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rabia Tehseen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rabia Tehseen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rabia Tehseen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rabia Tehseen. The network helps show where Rabia Tehseen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Rabia Tehseen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Rabia Tehseen Line = papers co-authored together Rabia Tehseen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 202368
2 202050
3 202133
4 202326
5 202311
6 202011
7 20239
8 20237
9 20226
10 20186
11 20214
12 20212
13 20231
14 20241
15 20250

About Rabia Tehseen

Rabia Tehseen is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Geophysics, Computer Science Applications, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 15 papers that have together received 235 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Seismology and Earthquake Studies (5 papers), Earthquake Detection and Analysis (4 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (3 papers), earthquake and tectonic studies (3 papers), Teaching and Learning Programming (1 paper), Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (1 paper), COVID-19 diagnosis using AI (1 paper) and IoT-based Smart Home Systems (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (67 citations), Artificial Intelligence (85 citations), Computer Science Applications (14 citations), Geophysics (33 citations) and Health Information Management (5 citations). Rabia Tehseen has collaborated with scholars based in Pakistan, Afghanistan and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Muhammad Shoaib Farooq, Adnan Abid, Zabihullah Atal, Muhammad Shoaib Farooq, Uzma Farooq, Khalid Saleem, Atif Alvi, Shazia Saqib, Rana Fayyaz Ahmad and Syed Tahir Hussain Rizvi. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Access, Education and Information Technologies, Scientific Reports, PeerJ Computer Science and Digital Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact