R. G. Mint︠s︡

2.9k citations
128 papers · 2.3k · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

R. G. Mint︠s︡

119 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

R. G. Mint︠s︡
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Condensed Matter Physics 1.9k
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 1.0k
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 585
  • Biomedical Engineering 540
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 129
Replace R. P. Huebener with:
R. P. Huebener Germany
B.J. Maddock United Kingdom
Yu. N. Ovchinnikov Russia
V. A. Yampol’skiı̆ Ukraine
É. B. Sonin Israel
N. B. Kopnin Russia
G. Paternò Italy
V. M. Krasnov Sweden
W. J. Skocpol United States
A. W. Kleinsasser United States
R. G. Mint︠s︡ relative to R. P. Huebener Germany R. P. Huebener's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.9×
R. P. Huebener · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by R. G. Mint︠s︡

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R. G. Mint︠s︡'s research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. G. Mint︠s︡ with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. G. Mint︠s︡ more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R. G. Mint︠s︡

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. G. Mint︠s︡. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. G. Mint︠s︡. The network helps show where R. G. Mint︠s︡ may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside R. G. Mint︠s︡, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with R. G. Mint︠s︡ Line = papers co-authored together R. G. Mint︠s︡ links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 128 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1987279
2 1981253
3 2012117
4 199791
5 201082
6 199880
7 201173
8 199666
9 201258
10 200157
11 200253
12 199646
13 199545
14 199739
15 199432
16 200430
17 198430
18 200727
19 198227
20 199327

About R. G. Mint︠s︡

R. G. Mint︠s︡ is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Biomedical Engineering, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and Geophysics, having authored 128 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (104 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (41 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (30 papers), Superconductivity in MgB2 and Alloys (21 papers), Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (16 papers), Iron-based superconductors research (16 papers), Magnetic properties of thin films (15 papers) and Theoretical and Computational Physics (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (1.9k citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (1.0k citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (585 citations), Biomedical Engineering (540 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (129 citations). R. G. Mint︠s︡ has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, Russia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include A. L. Rakhmanov, A. Gurevich, R. Kleiner, D. Koelle, E. Goldobin, V. G. Kogan, Ernst Helmut Brandt, John R. Clem, V. G. Kogan and Martin Weides. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review B, Physical review. B, Condensed matter, Journal of Physics D Applied Physics, Cryogenics and IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact