James E. Mercereau

73 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

James E. Mercereau
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Condensed Matter Physics 911
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 638
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 429
  • Aerospace Engineering 143
  • Biomedical Engineering 168
Replace R. de Bruyn Ouboter with:
R. de Bruyn Ouboter Netherlands
R. P. Giffard United States
T. Schurig Germany
Ronald F. Broom Switzerland
James M. Lockhart United States
Hidetoshi Minami Japan
Arttu R. Luukanen Finland
B.J. Maddock United Kingdom
Alan M. Kadin United States
John C. Mester United States
James E. Mercereau relative to R. de Bruyn Ouboter Netherlands R. de Bruyn Ouboter's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×
R. de Bruyn Ouboter · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James E. Mercereau

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James E. Mercereau's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James E. Mercereau with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James E. Mercereau more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James E. Mercereau

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James E. Mercereau. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James E. Mercereau. The network helps show where James E. Mercereau may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James E. Mercereau, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James E. Mercereau Line = papers co-authored together James E. Mercereau links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 74 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1964386
2 1965180
3 196593
4 197292
5 197188
6 196472
7 197361
8 197054
9 197146
10 197243
11 195938
12 197537
13 195635
14 197335
15 196733
16 197132
17 198631
18 197729
19 196428
20 196427

About James E. Mercereau

James E. Mercereau is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Aerospace Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 74 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (38 papers), Superconducting and THz Device Technology (29 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (13 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (8 papers), Quantum and Classical Electrodynamics (3 papers), Pulsed Power Technology Applications (2 papers), Quantum Information and Cryptography (2 papers) and Magnetic Field Sensors Techniques (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (911 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (638 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (429 citations), Aerospace Engineering (143 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (168 citations). James E. Mercereau has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Arnold H. Silver, John Lambe, Robert C. Jaklevic, Harris Notarys, Douglas J. Scalapino, James Edward Zimmerman, G.J. Dick, David William Palmer, Jean R. Delayen and S. Sridhar. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Journal of Applied Physics, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Applied Physics Letters and IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact