R. Fraser Code

495 citations
36 papers · 448 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

R. Fraser Code

35 papers receiving 423 citations

Peers

R. Fraser Code
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Spectroscopy 192
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 233
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 64
  • Biophysics 22
  • Materials Chemistry 125
Replace William E. Wageman with:
William E. Wageman United States
Anthony A. Silvidi United States
H. Glättli France
Theodore Vladimiroff United States
Raymond Van Steenwinkel Italy
D. W. Posener Australia
B. W. Johnson United States
KAZIMIERZ LUSZCZYNSKI United States
Uri El-Hanany Israel
Vagn Langer Germany
R. Fraser Code relative to William E. Wageman United States William E. Wageman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
William E. Wageman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by R. Fraser Code

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R. Fraser Code's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. Fraser Code with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. Fraser Code more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R. Fraser Code

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. Fraser Code. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. Fraser Code. The network helps show where R. Fraser Code may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside R. Fraser Code, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with R. Fraser Code Line = papers co-authored together R. Fraser Code links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197198
2 197638
3 198336
4 197428
5 199022
6 198720
7 197617
8 197817
9 198316
10 196716
11 196815
12 198113
13 19849
14 19869
15 19909
16 19848
17 19767
18 19907
19 19866
20 19856

About R. Fraser Code

R. Fraser Code is a scholar working on Spectroscopy, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Materials Chemistry, having authored 36 papers that have together received 448 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications (18 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (10 papers), NMR spectroscopy and applications (9 papers), Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics (6 papers), Solid-state spectroscopy and crystallography (6 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (5 papers), Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research (4 papers) and Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Spectroscopy (192 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (233 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (64 citations), Biophysics (22 citations) and Materials Chemistry (125 citations). R. Fraser Code has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Norman F. Ramsey, JOHN HIGINBOTHAM, Joan E. Harrison, K. G. McNeill, Henry M. van Driel, Palash Bharadwaj, J. S. M. Harvey, Irving Ozier, Neil Gelman and Allan R. Sharp. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Chemical Physics, Physics in Medicine and Biology, Optics Communications, Applied Physics Letters and Review of Scientific Instruments.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact