R. Fordham
Impact in
- Plant Science top 5%
- Garlic and Onion Studies
- Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies
- Horticultural and Viticultural Research
- Flowering Plant Growth and Cultivation
- Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics
- Soil Science top 10%
- Irrigation Practices and Water Management
Papers in
-
- Garlic and Onion Studies 7
- Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies 5
- Flowering Plant Growth and Cultivation 4
- Horticultural and Viticultural Research 3
- Leaf Properties and Growth Measurement 2
-
- Tea Polyphenols and Effects 4
- Co-authors
- M. A. Rahim (6 shared papers)Richard Palmer‐Jones (1 shared paper)P. Hadley (5 shared papers)Lord Abbey (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Scientia Horticulturae (4 papers)Experimental Agriculture (3 papers)Annals of Botany (1 paper)Outlook on Agriculture (1 paper)Acta Horticulturae (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
R. Fordham
26 papers receiving 399 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- Plant Science 412
- Soil Science 92
- Agronomy and Crop Science 33
- Cell Biology 51
- Horticulture 3
Countries citing papers authored by R. Fordham
This map shows the geographic impact of R. Fordham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. Fordham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. Fordham more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by R. Fordham
This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. Fordham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. Fordham. The network helps show where R. Fordham may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside R. Fordham, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1995 | 167 | |
| 2 | 1996 | 81 | |
| 3 | 1988 | 29 | |
| 4 | 1991 | 27 | |
| 5 | 1972 | 27 | |
| 6 | 1977 | 25 | |
| 7 | 1983 | 15 | |
| 8 | 2001 | 13 | |
| 9 | 1997 | 13 | |
| 10 | 1995 | 10 | |
| 11 | 1994 | 9 | |
| 12 | Principles of Vegetable Crop Production | 1985 | 8 |
| 13 | 1972 | 7 | |
| 14 | 1990 | 6 | |
| 15 | 1977 | 6 | |
| 16 | 2003 | 6 | |
| 17 | 2003 | 6 | |
| 18 | 1994 | 5 | |
| 19 | 1973 | 5 | |
| 20 | 2003 | 4 |
About R. Fordham
R. Fordham is a scholar working on Plant Science, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Molecular Biology and Ecology, having authored 28 papers that have together received 479 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Garlic and Onion Studies (7 papers), Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (5 papers), Flowering Plant Growth and Cultivation (4 papers), Tea Polyphenols and Effects (4 papers), Horticultural and Viticultural Research (3 papers), Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems (2 papers), Leaf Properties and Growth Measurement (2 papers) and Irrigation Practices and Water Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (412 citations), Soil Science (92 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (33 citations), Cell Biology (51 citations) and Horticulture (3 citations). R. Fordham has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include M. A. Rahim, Richard Palmer‐Jones, P. Hadley and Lord Abbey. Their work appears in journals such as Scientia Horticulturae, Experimental Agriculture, Annals of Botany, Outlook on Agriculture and Acta Horticulturae.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.