R. Feile

1.8k citations
53 papers · 1.7k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

R. Feile

50 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

R. Feile
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Condensed Matter Physics 790
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 435
  • Ceramics and Composites 108
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 575
  • Materials Chemistry 737
Replace K. A. Gehring with:
K. A. Gehring United States
K. W. Blazey Switzerland
E. Schönherr Germany
J.W. Hodby United Kingdom
D. W. Cooke United States
W. R. Datars Canada
J. L. Fry United States
B. Salce France
W. E. Carlos United States
D. M. Eagles Australia
R. Feile relative to K. A. Gehring United States K. A. Gehring's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
K. A. Gehring · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by R. Feile

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R. Feile's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. Feile with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. Feile more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R. Feile

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. Feile. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. Feile. The network helps show where R. Feile may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside R. Feile, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with R. Feile Line = papers co-authored together R. Feile links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 53 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996470
2 1989195
3 1991157
4 198297
5 198464
6 200659
7 198154
8 199653
9 198245
10 198136
11 198433
12 198328
13 199328
14 201528
15 198825
16 198023
17 198423
18 201322
19 198519
20 198817

About R. Feile

R. Feile is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Materials Chemistry, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and Geophysics, having authored 53 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (26 papers), Solid-state spectroscopy and crystallography (12 papers), Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (10 papers), High-pressure geophysics and materials (9 papers), Magnetic properties of thin films (9 papers), Rare-earth and actinide compounds (8 papers), Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials (7 papers) and Material Dynamics and Properties (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (790 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (435 citations), Ceramics and Composites (108 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (575 citations) and Materials Chemistry (737 citations). R. Feile has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Denmark and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Westerhoff, K. Knorr, A. Loidl, Jørgen Kjems, C. Ottermann, K. Bange, O. Anderson, Michael Laube, P. Leǐderer and Hans U. Güdel. Their work appears in journals such as Physical review. B, Condensed matter, The European Physical Journal B, Physica C Superconductivity, Physical Review Letters and Solid State Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact