R. E. Pitt
Impact in
- Agronomy and Crop Science top 0.5%
- Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
- Reproductive Physiology in Livestock
- Forestry top 1%
Papers in
-
- Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology 26
-
- Plant Surface Properties and Treatments 9
- Co-authors
- Alice N. Pell (5 shared papers)P. Schofield (3 shared papers)Ta‐Te Lin (7 shared papers)R. E. Muck (8 shared papers)Peter L. Steponkus (9 shared papers)S. Leigh Phoenix (4 shared papers)D. G. Fox (5 shared papers)Hung-Liang Chen (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Cryobiology (11 papers)Journal of Dairy Science (5 papers)Grass and Forage Science (4 papers)jpa (3 papers)Journal of Texture Studies (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesHungaryTaiwan
In The Last Decade
R. E. Pitt
79 papers receiving 2.5k citations
R. E. Pitt's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 142
- Agronomy and Crop Science 1.1k
- Forestry 179
- Animal Science and Zoology 329
- Reproductive Medicine 182
- Plant Science 737
Countries citing papers authored by R. E. Pitt
This map shows the geographic impact of R. E. Pitt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. E. Pitt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. E. Pitt more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by R. E. Pitt
This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. E. Pitt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. E. Pitt. The network helps show where R. E. Pitt may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside R. E. Pitt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 82 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kinetics of fiber digestion from in vitro gas production Hit paper breakdown → | 1994 | 404 |
| 2 | 1990 | 171 | |
| 3 | 1986 | 155 | |
| 4 | 1996 | 134 | |
| 5 | 1995 | 100 | |
| 6 | 1982 | 91 | |
| 7 | 1993 | 90 | |
| 8 | 1983 | 83 | |
| 9 | 1983 | 74 | |
| 10 | 1999 | 73 | |
| 11 | 1985 | 72 | |
| 12 | 1993 | 63 | |
| 13 | 1987 | 61 | |
| 14 | 1995 | 59 | |
| 15 | 1998 | 54 | |
| 16 | 1991 | 50 | |
| 17 | 1991 | 47 | |
| 18 | 1993 | 46 | |
| 19 | 1991 | 42 | |
| 20 | 1997 | 38 |
About R. E. Pitt
R. E. Pitt is a scholar working on Agronomy and Crop Science, Plant Science, Civil and Structural Engineering, Mechanical Engineering and Food Science, having authored 82 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (26 papers), Soil Mechanics and Vehicle Dynamics (9 papers), Plant Surface Properties and Treatments (9 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (6 papers), Tree Root and Stability Studies (6 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (6 papers), Agricultural Engineering and Mechanization (6 papers) and Polysaccharides Composition and Applications (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Agronomy and Crop Science (1.1k citations), Forestry (179 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (329 citations), Reproductive Medicine (182 citations) and Plant Science (737 citations). R. E. Pitt has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Hungary and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Alice N. Pell, P. Schofield, Ta‐Te Lin, R. E. Muck, Peter L. Steponkus, S. Leigh Phoenix, D. G. Fox, Hung-Liang Chen, Stanley P. Myers and M BARRY. Their work appears in journals such as Cryobiology, Journal of Dairy Science, Grass and Forage Science, jpa and Journal of Texture Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.