Q Lê

51 papers receiving 503 citations

Peers

Q Lê
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 106
  • Strategy and Management 162
  • Economics and Econometrics 276
  • Business and International Management 16
  • Marketing 52
Replace Muhammad Irfan Chani with:
Muhammad Irfan Chani Pakistan
Irwan Shah Zainal Abidin Malaysia
Rana Yassir Hussain Pakistan
Farzan Yahya China
Elena Pelinescu Romania
Faisal Mustafa Pakistan
Abiola John Asaleye Nigeria
Joseph Ato Forson Ghana
Chih-Chuan Yeh Taiwan
Q Lê relative to Muhammad Irfan Chani Pakistan Muhammad Irfan Chani's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Muhammad Irfan Chani · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Q Lê

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Q Lê's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Q Lê with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Q Lê more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Q Lê

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Q Lê. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Q Lê. The network helps show where Q Lê may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Q Lê, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Q Lê Line = papers co-authored together Q Lê links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201186
2 202140
3 202039
4 202029
5 201927
6 202026
7 202125
8 202123
9 201723
10 202018
11 201915
12 202014
13 202014
14 201913
15 201810
16 202010
17 202210
18
Critical discourse analysis: an overview
20098
19 20248
20 20208

About Q Lê

Q Lê is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance and Emergency Medical Services, having authored 57 papers that have together received 557 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (12 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (7 papers), Global trade and economics (7 papers), Economic Growth and Productivity (7 papers), Income, Poverty, and Inequality (5 papers), Energy, Environment, Economic Growth (5 papers), Microfinance and Financial Inclusion (4 papers) and Global Health and Surgery (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (106 citations), Strategy and Management (162 citations), Economics and Econometrics (276 citations), Business and International Management (16 citations) and Marketing (52 citations). Q Lê has collaborated with scholars based in Vietnam, Australia and Malaysia. Frequent co-authors include Richard Pomfret, Anh Duc, Quang Vinh Nguyễn, Nguyễn Thị Hải Yến, Mạnh Dũng Trần, Cuc Thi Thu Nguyen, Thai‐Ha Le, Lan Huong Tran, Daniel Terry and David C. Hall. Their work appears in journals such as Management of Environmental Quality An International Journal, Eurasian economic review :, International Journal of Infectious Diseases, American Journal of Health Behavior and BMC Public Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact