Prue McRae

32 papers receiving 557 citations

Peers

Prue McRae
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 102
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 65
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 58
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 5
  • General Health Professions 87
Replace Ann Christine Bodilsen with:
Ann Christine Bodilsen Denmark
Myra Enloe United States
Jiro Okochi Japan
Orly Tonkikh Israel
Adrian Hopper United Kingdom
Michael Dorevitch Australia
Jiraporn Sri‐on Thailand
Annette Lavezza United States
Xianxiu Wen China
Fredrik Sjöstrand Sweden
Prue McRae relative to Ann Christine Bodilsen Denmark Ann Christine Bodilsen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.7×
Ann Christine Bodilsen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Prue McRae

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Prue McRae's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Prue McRae with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Prue McRae more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Prue McRae

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Prue McRae. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Prue McRae. The network helps show where Prue McRae may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Prue McRae, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Prue McRae Line = papers co-authored together Prue McRae links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201673
2 201868
3 202050
4 201649
5 202249
6 201743
7 200932
8 201631
9 200817
10 201917
11 202116
12 202115
13 202013
14 202313
15 201312
16 20207
17 20206
18 20216
19 20206
20 20236

About Prue McRae

Prue McRae is a scholar working on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, General Health Professions, Geriatrics and Gerontology, Physiology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 36 papers that have together received 569 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (7 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (6 papers), Nutrition and Health in Aging (4 papers), Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention (3 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (2 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (2 papers), Burn Injury Management and Outcomes (2 papers) and Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (102 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (65 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (58 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (5 citations) and General Health Professions (87 citations). Prue McRae has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Alison Mudge, Adrienne Young, Nancye M. Peel, Ruth E. Hubbard, Sharon K. Inouye, Adrian Barnett, Wen Kwang Lim, Michael C. Reade, Merrilyn Banks and Peter Donovan. Their work appears in journals such as Australasian Journal on Ageing, BMC Health Services Research, Age and Ageing, Journal of Clinical Nursing and BMC Geriatrics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact