Polpass Arul Jose
About
In The Last Decade
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Polpass Arul Jose
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Polpass Arul Jose. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Polpass Arul Jose based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Polpass Arul Jose. Polpass Arul Jose is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Polpass Arul Jose
35 papers receiving 959 citations
Fields of papers citing papers by Polpass Arul Jose
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Polpass Arul Jose. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Polpass Arul Jose. The network helps show where Polpass Arul Jose may publish in the future.
Countries citing papers authored by Polpass Arul Jose
This map shows the geographic impact of Polpass Arul Jose's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Polpass Arul Jose with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Polpass Arul Jose more than expected).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.