Po-Hsin Ho
Impact in
- Accounting top 5%
- Corporate Finance and Governance
- Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
- Islamic Finance and Banking Studies
- Finance top 5%
- Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
- Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
- Credit Risk and Financial Regulations
Papers in
- Accounting 11
- Corporate Finance and Governance 10
- Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance 5
- Financial Distress and Bankruptcy Prediction 1
- Finance 9
- Banking stability, regulation, efficiency 5
- Credit Risk and Financial Regulations 3
- Financial Markets and Investment Strategies 3
- Co-authors
- Chih-Yung Lin (10 shared papers)Ju‐Fang Yen (4 shared papers)Chung-Hua Shen (1 shared paper)Yehning Chen (2 shared papers)Wei‐Che Tsai (3 shared papers)Hsiang‐Lin Chih (1 shared paper)Chih‐Yung Lin (1 shared paper)
In The Last Decade
Po-Hsin Ho
12 papers receiving 319 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 31
- Accounting 253
- Finance 162
- Strategy and Management 91
- General Decision Sciences 6
- Economics and Econometrics 74
Countries citing papers authored by Po-Hsin Ho
This map shows the geographic impact of Po-Hsin Ho's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Po-Hsin Ho with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Po-Hsin Ho more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Po-Hsin Ho
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Po-Hsin Ho. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Po-Hsin Ho. The network helps show where Po-Hsin Ho may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside Po-Hsin Ho, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2016 | 196 | |
| 2 | 2015 | 37 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 33 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 11 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 11 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 9 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 9 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 8 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 7 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 4 | |
| 11 | 2012 | 4 | |
| 12 | 2016 | 1 |
About Po-Hsin Ho
Po-Hsin Ho is a scholar working on Accounting, Finance, Strategy and Management, Sociology and Political Science and Information Systems, having authored 12 papers that have together received 330 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Corporate Finance and Governance (10 papers), Banking stability, regulation, efficiency (5 papers), Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (5 papers), Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (3 papers), Credit Risk and Financial Regulations (3 papers), Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (3 papers), Economic Growth and Development (1 paper) and Financial Distress and Bankruptcy Prediction (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Accounting (253 citations), Finance (162 citations), Strategy and Management (91 citations), General Decision Sciences (6 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (74 citations). Po-Hsin Ho has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan and China. Frequent co-authors include Chih-Yung Lin, Ju‐Fang Yen, Chung-Hua Shen, Yehning Chen, Wei‐Che Tsai, Hsiang‐Lin Chih and Chih‐Yung Lin. Their work appears in journals such as International Review of Economics & Finance, Journal of Financial Economics, Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Journal of Corporate Finance and Journal of Financial Stability.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.