Pleas Copas

26 papers receiving 410 citations

Peers

Pleas Copas
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Reproductive Medicine 94
  • Rheumatology 99
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 48
  • Urology 36
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 90
Replace Edmund R. Novak with:
Edmund R. Novak United States
John C. Leissring United States
Devrim Ertunç Türkiye
Novak Er
Serafim Iosif Sweden
A. Kontoravdis Greece
Marta Šnajderová Czechia
Octavian Munteanu Romania
Mario Valenzano Italy
Anne‐Mette Bay Bjørn Denmark
Pleas Copas relative to Edmund R. Novak United States Edmund R. Novak's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×22×
Edmund R. Novak · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Pleas Copas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Pleas Copas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pleas Copas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pleas Copas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Pleas Copas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pleas Copas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pleas Copas. The network helps show where Pleas Copas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Pleas Copas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Pleas Copas Line = papers co-authored together Pleas Copas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200175
2 200356
3 199535
4 199529
5 199527
6 200826
7 200124
8 200821
9 200619
10 199817
11
Uterine prolapse after laparoscopic uterosacral transection. A case report.
199216
12 199615
13 199612
14 19988
15 20117
16 19957
17
Spindle cell carcinoma of the vulva.
19827
18 19836
19
Pelvic hematoma following placement of Transobturator Tape.
20055
20
Granular cell myoblastoma of the uterine cervix.
19815

About Pleas Copas

Pleas Copas is a scholar working on Surgery, Rheumatology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Epidemiology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, having authored 26 papers that have together received 429 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pelvic floor disorders treatments (6 papers), Urological Disorders and Treatments (3 papers), Tumors and Oncological Cases (3 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (3 papers), Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (2 papers), Ureteral procedures and complications (2 papers), Hernia repair and management (2 papers) and Herpesvirus Infections and Treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (94 citations), Rheumatology (99 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (48 citations), Urology (36 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (90 citations). Pleas Copas has collaborated with scholars based in United States, India and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Antonín Bukovský, Ira Horowitz, Michael R. Caudle, Robert F. Elder, Bhagirath Majmudar, Cyril O. Spann, William W. Thoms, Irma Virant‐Klun, Nirmala B. Upadhyaya and Roberto Domı́nguez. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecologic Oncology, Infectious Diseases in Obstetrics and Gynecology, Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy and Journal of Reproductive Immunology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact