Ping‐I Lin

96 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Peers

Ping‐I Lin
Comparison fields: 5 of 164
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 201
  • Biological Psychiatry 89
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 311
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 100
  • Environmental Chemistry 139
Replace Arieh Sierra Cohen with:
Arieh Sierra Cohen Denmark
Marianne Andersen Denmark
Elisabet Stener‐Victorin Sweden
Thomas Hugh Jones United Kingdom
Jinying Zhao United States
Rachel S. Gross United States
Sadhana Joshi India
Renee M. Gardner Sweden
Janneke Dijck-Brouwer Netherlands
Dietrich Klingmüller Germany
Ping‐I Lin relative to Arieh Sierra Cohen Denmark Arieh Sierra Cohen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.7×
Arieh Sierra Cohen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ping‐I Lin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ping‐I Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ping‐I Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ping‐I Lin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ping‐I Lin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ping‐I Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ping‐I Lin. The network helps show where Ping‐I Lin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ping‐I Lin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ping‐I Lin Line = papers co-authored together Ping‐I Lin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 106 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007411
2 2006235
3 2006184
4 2006147
5 2019137
6 2005132
7 2006104
8 201098
9 200983
10 200577
11 200776
12 201764
13 202162
14 200557
15 200456
16 201849
17 200543
18 201841
19 200438
20 201534

About Ping‐I Lin

Ping‐I Lin is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Genetics and Epidemiology, having authored 106 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (15 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (12 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (8 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (8 papers), Virology and Viral Diseases (5 papers), Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (5 papers), Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (4 papers) and COVID-19 and Mental Health (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (201 citations), Biological Psychiatry (89 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (311 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (100 citations) and Environmental Chemistry (139 citations). Ping‐I Lin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Eden R. Martin, Jeffery M. Vance, Margaret A. Pericak‐Vance, Gary S. Wand, Rachel Y. Chong, Lynn M. Oswald, Magdalena Uhart, Alan R. Shuldiner, Carl‐Gustaf Bornehag and Christian H. Lindh. Their work appears in journals such as Psychiatry Research, Psychiatric Quarterly, Scientific Reports, Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine and The American Journal of Human Genetics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact