Ping‐Chia Cheng

488 citations
28 papers · 341 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Ping‐Chia Cheng

20 papers receiving 337 citations

Peers

Ping‐Chia Cheng
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Otorhinolaryngology 53
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 228
  • Emergency Medical Services 34
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 11
  • Physiology 54
Replace Martin Y. Desrosiers with:
Martin Y. Desrosiers Canada
J.C. Grutters Netherlands
Krzysztof Specjalski Poland
Marc Albertini France
Jane Gilbert United Kingdom
Cabir Yüksel Türkiye
Thibaut Janss Belgium
Naoko Katsurada Japan
Hirotaka Nishikiori Japan
H. Luckhaupt Germany
Ping‐Chia Cheng relative to Martin Y. Desrosiers Canada Martin Y. Desrosiers's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Martin Y. Desrosiers · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ping‐Chia Cheng

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ping‐Chia Cheng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ping‐Chia Cheng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ping‐Chia Cheng more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ping‐Chia Cheng

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ping‐Chia Cheng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ping‐Chia Cheng. The network helps show where Ping‐Chia Cheng may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ping‐Chia Cheng, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ping‐Chia Cheng Line = papers co-authored together Ping‐Chia Cheng links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997217
2 202224
3 201719
4 201914
5 202210
6 20219
7 20198
8 20225
9 20225
10 20235
11 20225
12 20214
13 20243
14 20173
15 20223
16 20212
17 20242
18 20191
19 20211
20 20251

About Ping‐Chia Cheng

Ping‐Chia Cheng is a scholar working on Otorhinolaryngology, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Oncology and Physiology, having authored 28 papers that have together received 341 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Head and Neck Cancer Studies (12 papers), Salivary Gland Tumors Diagnosis and Treatment (7 papers), Tracheal and airway disorders (4 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (4 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (4 papers), Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis (3 papers), Ear and Head Tumors (3 papers) and Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Otorhinolaryngology (53 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (228 citations), Emergency Medical Services (34 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (11 citations) and Physiology (54 citations). Ping‐Chia Cheng has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan and United States. Frequent co-authors include Margaret W. Leigh, Robert E. Wood, Terry L. Noah, Henry R. Black, Wu‐Chia Lo, Li‐Jen Liao, Po‐Wen Cheng, Pei‐Wei Shueng, Chen-Hsi Hsieh and Wan‐Lun Hsu. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Otolaryngology, Scientific Reports, Frontiers in Oncology, Acta Oto-Laryngologica and Dysphagia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact