Ping Wing Ng

1.7k citations
20 papers · 735 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Ping Wing Ng

20 papers receiving 714 citations

Peers

Ping Wing Ng
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 215
  • Neurology 73
  • Neurology 122
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 142
  • Oncology 155
Replace C Leno with:
C Leno Spain
Muzaffar Siddiqui Canada
Vince Fazio United States
Takashi Nagayama Japan
A. Sengupta United States
Hung-Sheng Lin Taiwan
Paola Nicolaides United Kingdom
Jeeyoung Oh South Korea
Remzi Yiğiter Türkiye
Ping Wing Ng relative to C Leno Spain C Leno's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.3×
C Leno · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ping Wing Ng

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ping Wing Ng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ping Wing Ng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ping Wing Ng more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ping Wing Ng

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ping Wing Ng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ping Wing Ng. The network helps show where Ping Wing Ng may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ping Wing Ng, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ping Wing Ng Line = papers co-authored together Ping Wing Ng links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 2007102
2 200889
3 200788
4 200987
5 201155
6 200946
7 201139
8 201434
9 201333
10 201026
11 200926
12 200819
13 201018
14 201817
15 200815
16 201812
17 200912
18
Risk of stroke after acute myocardial infarction among Chinese.
20017
19 20136
20 20034

About Ping Wing Ng

Ping Wing Ng is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Neurology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 20 papers that have together received 735 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epilepsy research and treatment (4 papers), Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms (3 papers), Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases (3 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (3 papers), Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (3 papers), Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (3 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (2 papers) and Ion channel regulation and function (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (215 citations), Neurology (73 citations), Neurology (122 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (142 citations) and Oncology (155 citations). Ping Wing Ng has collaborated with scholars based in China, Hong Kong and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ka Sing Wong, Patrick Kwan, Larry Baum, Ngai Chuen Sin, Virginia Wong, Vincent Mok, Colin H. T. Lui, Adrian Wong, Colin Hiu Tung Lui and Ho‐Keung Ng. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neural Transmission, Pharmacogenomics, Epilepsy & Behavior, Cerebrovascular Diseases and Epilepsia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact