Ping Fei

1.2k citations
53 papers · 715 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Ping Fei

47 papers receiving 699 citations

Peers

Ping Fei
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Ophthalmology 166
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 211
  • Neurology 60
  • Health Informatics 8
  • Molecular Biology 285
Replace R.P. Kirwan with:
R.P. Kirwan Ireland
Kenichi Kimoto Japan
M. Küchle Germany
Ethan A. Chapin United States
Yannek I. Leiderman United States
Stefaniya Boneva Germany
Oscar F. Chacón‐Camacho Mexico
A. Franceschetti Switzerland
Thomas M. Richardson United States
Toshihiro Kono Japan
Ping Fei relative to R.P. Kirwan Ireland R.P. Kirwan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
R.P. Kirwan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ping Fei

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ping Fei's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ping Fei with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ping Fei more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ping Fei

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ping Fei. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ping Fei. The network helps show where Ping Fei may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ping Fei, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ping Fei Line = papers co-authored together Ping Fei links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 53 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201762
2 201362
3 201853
4 202150
5 201943
6 201640
7 201332
8 201031
9 201428
10
Identification of two novel LRP5 mutations in families with familial exudative vitreoretinopathy.
201425
11 202021
12 201821
13
Novel mutations in the TSPAN12 gene in Chinese patients with familial exudative vitreoretinopathy.
201420
14 202119
15 201619
16 202318
17 202416
18 201515
19 201915
20 202215

About Ping Fei

Ping Fei is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Ophthalmology, Cell Biology and Neurology, having authored 53 papers that have together received 715 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal and Macular Surgery (8 papers), Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer (8 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (7 papers), Retinopathy of Prematurity Studies (5 papers), Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways (4 papers), Hippo pathway signaling and YAP/TAZ (4 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (3 papers) and Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (166 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (211 citations), Neurology (60 citations), Health Informatics (8 citations) and Molecular Biology (285 citations). Ping Fei has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Peiquan Zhao, Xiang Zhang, Qi Zhang, Yian Li, Jie Peng, Yu Xu, Shoujian Wang, Christine M. Sorenson, Qiujing Huang and Jiao Lyu. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Ophthalmology, Frontiers in Medicine, Retina, Scientific Reports and Ocular Immunology and Inflammation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact