Ping Cheng

887 citations
26 papers · 669 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Ping Cheng

23 papers receiving 655 citations

Peers

Ping Cheng
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 325
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 319
  • Neurology 81
  • Sensory Systems 29
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 103
Replace Tao Dong with:
Tao Dong China
Shailendra Segobin France
Zina‐Mary Manjaly Switzerland
H. Strenge Germany
Rozanna Meijboom United Kingdom
Silke Jörgens Germany
Rosanna Palmeri Italy
Carole Scherling Canada
Roberto Grasso Italy
Saroja Bangaru United States
Ping Cheng relative to Tao Dong China Tao Dong's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Tao Dong · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ping Cheng

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ping Cheng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ping Cheng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ping Cheng more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ping Cheng

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ping Cheng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ping Cheng. The network helps show where Ping Cheng may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ping Cheng, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ping Cheng Line = papers co-authored together Ping Cheng links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012159
2 2013124
3 201399
4 201392
5 201358
6 201345
7 201629
8 201511
9 201911
10 20168
11 20188
12 20204
13 20223
14
Preservation of the fallopian tube in ectopic tubal pregnancy. An analysis of the outcome of two laparoscopic surgical approaches.
20223
15 19713
16 20252
17 20232
18 20192
19
Carotid stenting for irradiation-associated carotid stenosis 3 years after previous carotid endarterectomy.
20032
20
Research on the Dynamics Performance and Suspension Parameters of the Frame Type Freight Car Bogie
20031

About Ping Cheng

Ping Cheng is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health, Surgery, Molecular Biology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 26 papers that have together received 669 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (6 papers), Migraine and Headache Studies (4 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (3 papers), Mind wandering and attention (2 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (2 papers), Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (2 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (2 papers) and Long-Term Effects of COVID-19 (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (325 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (319 citations), Neurology (81 citations), Sensory Systems (29 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (103 citations). Ping Cheng has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Dahua Yu, Wei Qin, Tao Dong, Kai Yuan, Karen M. von Deneen, Jie Tian, Ling Zhao, Limei Zhao, Ting Xue and Yanzhi Bi. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, NMR in Biomedicine, Scientific Reports, Aging and Journal of Pain.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact