Piers Mook
Impact in
- Endocrinology top 5%
- Escherichia coli research studies
- Biotechnology top 2%
- Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety
Papers in
- Food Science 15
- Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology 13
- Food Safety and Hygiene 9
- Epidemiology 11
- Influenza Virus Research Studies 7
- Respiratory viral infections research 4
- Co-authors
- Iain Gillespie (9 shared papers)S. O’Brien (4 shared papers)C.L. Little (4 shared papers)Kathie Grant (5 shared papers)Paul Crook (9 shared papers)Claire Jenkins (6 shared papers)Timothy J. Dallman (6 shared papers)Jim McLauchlin (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Epidemiology and Infection (11 papers)Eurosurveillance (7 papers)Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses (3 papers)Emerging infectious diseases (2 papers)Foodborne Pathogens and Disease (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomDenmarkSweden
In The Last Decade
Piers Mook
33 papers receiving 771 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Endocrinology 145
- Biotechnology 225
- Food Science 248
- Infectious Diseases 201
- Parasitology 48
Countries citing papers authored by Piers Mook
This map shows the geographic impact of Piers Mook's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Piers Mook with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Piers Mook more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Piers Mook
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Piers Mook. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Piers Mook. The network helps show where Piers Mook may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Piers Mook, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2021 | 79 | |
| 2 | 2015 | 79 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 79 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 58 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 53 | |
| 6 | 2009 | 45 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 45 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 36 | |
| 9 | 2010 | 34 | |
| 10 | 2010 | 31 | |
| 11 | 2006 | 29 | |
| 12 | 2007 | 22 | |
| 13 | 2023 | 21 | |
| 14 | 2018 | 21 | |
| 15 | 2011 | 20 | |
| 16 | 2007 | 19 | |
| 17 | 2018 | 15 | |
| 18 | 2015 | 14 | |
| 19 | 2021 | 13 | |
| 20 | 2020 | 13 |
About Piers Mook
Piers Mook is a scholar working on Food Science, Epidemiology, Infectious Diseases, Biotechnology and Endocrinology, having authored 34 papers that have together received 785 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology (13 papers), Food Safety and Hygiene (9 papers), Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety (8 papers), Influenza Virus Research Studies (7 papers), Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology (4 papers), Respiratory viral infections research (4 papers), Vibrio bacteria research studies (3 papers) and Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology (145 citations), Biotechnology (225 citations), Food Science (248 citations), Infectious Diseases (201 citations) and Parasitology (48 citations). Piers Mook has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Denmark and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Iain Gillespie, S. O’Brien, C.L. Little, Kathie Grant, Paul Crook, Claire Jenkins, Timothy J. Dallman, Jim McLauchlin, Goutam K. Adak and Gwenda Hughes. Their work appears in journals such as Epidemiology and Infection, Eurosurveillance, Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses, Emerging infectious diseases and Foodborne Pathogens and Disease.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.