Pia Erdmann

533 citations
27 papers · 406 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Pia Erdmann

24 papers receiving 391 citations

Peers

Pia Erdmann
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Health Informatics 14
  • Internal Medicine 17
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 84
  • General Health Professions 57
  • Epidemiology 75
Replace Shweta Mital with:
Shweta Mital Canada
Anne Lydon United Kingdom
Craig W. Robbins United States
Khaled Mohamed Ragab Egypt
Thomas J. Glorioso United States
Francis Ratsimbazafy United States
Annabel Allison United Kingdom
Martin Langanke Germany
Shrilla Banerjee United Kingdom
В. А. Бадтиева Russia
Pia Erdmann relative to Shweta Mital Canada Shweta Mital's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.7×
Shweta Mital · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Pia Erdmann

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Pia Erdmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pia Erdmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pia Erdmann more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Pia Erdmann

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pia Erdmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pia Erdmann. The network helps show where Pia Erdmann may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Pia Erdmann, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Pia Erdmann Line = papers co-authored together Pia Erdmann links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201688
2 201268
3 201443
4 201630
5 201622
6 201921
7 201319
8
Ethical and legal issues when dealing with genetic incidental findings—challenges and possible solutions
201418
9 201117
10 201311
11 20159
12 20178
13 20228
14 20137
15 20157
16 20126
17 20155
18 20164
19 20134
20 20163

About Pia Erdmann

Pia Erdmann is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Economics and Econometrics, Genetics and Pharmacology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 406 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in Clinical Research (7 papers), Health and Medical Studies (4 papers), Risk Perception and Management (4 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (4 papers), Genomics and Rare Diseases (3 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (2 papers), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (2 papers) and Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (14 citations), Internal Medicine (17 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (84 citations), General Health Professions (57 citations) and Epidemiology (75 citations). Pia Erdmann has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Martin Langanke, Kyle Bertram Brothers, Tobias Fischer, Sabine Rudnik-Schöneborn, Henry Völzke, Hans Jörgen Grabe, Katrin Hegenscheid, Reiner Biffar, Carsten Oliver Schmidt and Thomas Kohlmann. Their work appears in journals such as European Radiology, BMC Medical Ethics, Stroke, Journal of Clinical Medicine and Trials.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact