PHM Peeters

2.3k citations
19 papers · 635 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

    • Breast Cancer Treatment Studies 9
    • Global Cancer Incidence and Screening 7
    • Cancer Risks and Factors 5
    • Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection 3

PHM Peeters

19 papers receiving 611 citations

Peers

PHM Peeters
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Cancer Research 275
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 256
  • Oncology 216
  • Reproductive Medicine 47
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 35
Replace D B Thomas with:
D B Thomas United States
J. L. Hayward United Kingdom
Young Up Cho South Korea
S. E. Hankinson United States
L Holmberg Sweden
Peggy Wan United States
Sabine Oskar United States
Antonio Navareño Mateos Spain
J.-C. van der Auwera Belgium
Reinhold Bergstr�m Sweden
PHM Peeters relative to D B Thomas United States D B Thomas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.9×
D B Thomas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by PHM Peeters

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of PHM Peeters's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by PHM Peeters with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites PHM Peeters more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by PHM Peeters

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by PHM Peeters. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by PHM Peeters. The network helps show where PHM Peeters may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside PHM Peeters, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with PHM Peeters Line = papers co-authored together PHM Peeters links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2009143
2 2000119
3 199174
4 201045
5 200736
6 201533
7 201532
8 200229
9 199825
10 201524
11 198724
12 200114
13 200212
14 198410
15 19886
16 20025
17 20022
18
[Observed effects of the mass screening program for breast cancer in Nijmegen in 1975-1986].
19901
19 20041

About PHM Peeters

PHM Peeters is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Oncology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Artificial Intelligence and Surgery, having authored 19 papers that have together received 635 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (9 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (7 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (6 papers), Cancer Risks and Factors (5 papers), AI in cancer detection (4 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (3 papers), Breast Implant and Reconstruction (3 papers) and Endometriosis Research and Treatment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (275 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (256 citations), Oncology (216 citations), Reproductive Medicine (47 citations) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (35 citations). PHM Peeters has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Switzerland and Guatemala. Frequent co-authors include Helena M. Verkooijen, I.H.M. Borel Rinkes, Erik Buskens, Th. J. M. V. van Vroonhoven, V.C.M. Koot, Emiel J. Rutgers, Willem P.Th.M. Mali, J.H.C.L. Hendriks, Roland Holland and Eugène Jansen. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Cancer, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, European Journal of Cancer, Cancer and The Lancet.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact