Phillip E. Warwick

96 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Phillip E. Warwick
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 715
  • Inorganic Chemistry 748
  • Global and Planetary Change 1.1k
  • Radiation 231
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 178
Replace Sven Poul Nielsen with:
Sven Poul Nielsen Denmark
Galina Lujanienė Lithuania
H. Dahlgaard Denmark
K.A. Orlandini United States
E. Holm Sweden
M. Betti Germany
Hirofumi Tazoe Japan
Pascal Froidevaux Switzerland
Aya Sakaguchi Japan
Yasuhito Igarashi Japan
Phillip E. Warwick relative to Sven Poul Nielsen Denmark Sven Poul Nielsen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Sven Poul Nielsen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Phillip E. Warwick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Phillip E. Warwick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phillip E. Warwick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phillip E. Warwick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Phillip E. Warwick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phillip E. Warwick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phillip E. Warwick. The network helps show where Phillip E. Warwick may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Phillip E. Warwick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Phillip E. Warwick Line = papers co-authored together Phillip E. Warwick links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 99 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002174
2 2006112
3 1998112
4 2007100
5 200193
6 200883
7 201573
8 201866
9 201663
10 199847
11 199946
12 200146
13 202142
14 200642
15 200339
16 201438
17 201237
18 200136
19 201033
20 201431

About Phillip E. Warwick

Phillip E. Warwick is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Inorganic Chemistry, Radiation and Materials Chemistry, having authored 99 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Radioactive contamination and transfer (66 papers), Radioactivity and Radon Measurements (40 papers), Radioactive element chemistry and processing (36 papers), Nuclear and radioactivity studies (15 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (13 papers), Graphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies (11 papers), Radiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies (8 papers) and Chemical Synthesis and Characterization (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (715 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (748 citations), Global and Planetary Change (1.1k citations), Radiation (231 citations) and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (178 citations). Phillip E. Warwick has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, South Korea and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Ian W. Croudace, Rex N. Taylor, Thorsten Warneke, Ben Russell, James A. Milton, Andrew B. Cundy, Mikhail V. Zubkov, Peter Burkill, David J. Scanlan and Isabelle Mary. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, Analytical Chemistry, Applied Radiation and Isotopes, Analytica Chimica Acta and Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact