Phillip E. Smith

15 papers receiving 427 citations

Peers

Phillip E. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 126
  • Materials Chemistry 284
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 212
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 77
  • Condensed Matter Physics 27
Replace S. Ahlers with:
S. Ahlers Germany
Abdullah Alkhateeb United States
Zhangyuan Zhang China
J.‐P. Richters Germany
Adam T. Barton United States
Minglin Zhao China
Edward B. Lochocki United States
Thi Huong Nguyen Vietnam
William Deacon United Kingdom
Phillip E. Smith relative to S. Ahlers Germany S. Ahlers's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.3×
S. Ahlers · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Phillip E. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Phillip E. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phillip E. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phillip E. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Phillip E. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phillip E. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phillip E. Smith. The network helps show where Phillip E. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Phillip E. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Phillip E. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Phillip E. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2005222
2 200369
3 195768
4 199521
5 200218
6 200410
7 20058
8 20027
9
Soybean harvesting: approaches to improved harvesting efficiencies
19625
10 20085
11 20072
12 20051
13
Effect of different dates and rates of planting soybeans.
19591
14
Research notes: Correlated response of certain plant traits with seed yield insoybeans
19781
15 19591

About Phillip E. Smith

Phillip E. Smith is a scholar working on Agronomy and Crop Science, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Condensed Matter Physics, Materials Chemistry and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 15 papers that have together received 439 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices (4 papers), Soybean genetics and cultivation (4 papers), Copper-based nanomaterials and applications (3 papers), ZnO doping and properties (3 papers), Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties (2 papers), Plant Pathogens and Resistance (2 papers), Ga2O3 and related materials (2 papers) and Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (126 citations), Materials Chemistry (284 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (212 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (77 citations) and Condensed Matter Physics (27 citations). Phillip E. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include L. J. Brillson, Yuri M. Strzhemechny, D. C. Reynolds, B. D. White, D. C. Look, Howard L. Mosbacker, C. W. Litton, August F. Schmitthenner, R. L. Bernard and Junjik Bae. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Physics Letters, Agronomy Journal, Journal of Applied Physics, The Lancet and Solid-State Electronics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact