Phillip E. Pope

1.3k citations
44 papers · 1.1k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Phillip E. Pope

40 papers receiving 937 citations

Peers

Phillip E. Pope
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
  • Forestry 211
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 276
  • Soil Science 315
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 114
  • Insect Science 61
Replace D. J. Mead with:
D. J. Mead New Zealand
Benoît Truax Canada
Eliel Steen Sweden
Andrew R. Gillespie United States
Felix Ponder United States
E. F. C. Campello Brazil
Christian Böhm Germany
Allan E. Tiarks United States
Deb Raj Aryal Mexico
Stanislav Hejduk Czechia
Phillip E. Pope relative to D. J. Mead New Zealand D. J. Mead's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.8×
D. J. Mead · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Phillip E. Pope

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Phillip E. Pope's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phillip E. Pope with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phillip E. Pope more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Phillip E. Pope

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phillip E. Pope. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phillip E. Pope. The network helps show where Phillip E. Pope may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Phillip E. Pope, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Phillip E. Pope Line = papers co-authored together Phillip E. Pope links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000111
2 2000100
3 200170
4 198864
5 198859
6 200159
7 198458
8 198351
9 198942
10 199040
11 200038
12 199532
13 200332
14 198727
15 197426
16 198523
17 198723
18 199021
19 199221
20 198920

About Phillip E. Pope

Phillip E. Pope is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Soil Science, Agronomy and Crop Science, Plant Science and Forestry, having authored 44 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (13 papers), Seedling growth and survival studies (11 papers), Forest ecology and management (10 papers), Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (8 papers), Soil Management and Crop Yield (5 papers), Bioenergy crop production and management (4 papers), Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism (4 papers) and Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Forestry (211 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (276 citations), Soil Science (315 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (114 citations) and Insect Science (61 citations). Phillip E. Pope has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include A. R. Gillespie, Felix Ponder, Travis W. Idol, S. Jose, John R. Seifert, William R. Chaney, Andrew R. Gillespie, Edward A. Hansen, William R. Byrnes and Richard A. McLaughlin. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Journal of Forest Research, Soil Science Society of America Journal, Forest Ecology and Management, Agroforestry Systems and Northern Journal of Applied Forestry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact