Philippa J. Johnson

32 papers receiving 378 citations

Peers

Philippa J. Johnson
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Small Animals 121
  • Sensory Systems 21
  • Equine 7
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 56
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 61
Replace Roberto Poma with:
Roberto Poma Canada
E. Klemm Germany
Joan Mascort Spain
M. Paradis Canada
Lara Matiasek United Kingdom
Dana Georgevsky Australia
Marc Kent United States
Eric S. Jensen United States
Michelle Webster United Kingdom
K Knowles United States
Philippa J. Johnson relative to Roberto Poma Canada Roberto Poma's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.1×
Roberto Poma · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philippa J. Johnson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philippa J. Johnson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philippa J. Johnson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philippa J. Johnson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philippa J. Johnson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philippa J. Johnson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philippa J. Johnson. The network helps show where Philippa J. Johnson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philippa J. Johnson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philippa J. Johnson Line = papers co-authored together Philippa J. Johnson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202041
2 202039
3 202036
4 201222
5 202222
6 201719
7 202119
8 202018
9 201617
10 198916
11 202014
12 201913
13 201510
14 201210
15 202010
16 20099
17 20199
18 20228
19 20208
20 20228

About Philippa J. Johnson

Philippa J. Johnson is a scholar working on Surgery, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Small Animals, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Genetics, having authored 34 papers that have together received 397 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (7 papers), Veterinary Oncology Research (5 papers), Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology (5 papers), Human-Animal Interaction Studies (3 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (3 papers), MRI in cancer diagnosis (2 papers), Spinal Dysraphism and Malformations (2 papers) and Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Small Animals (121 citations), Sensory Systems (21 citations), Equine (7 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (56 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (61 citations). Philippa J. Johnson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include Erica F. Barry, Wen‐Ming Luh, Ruth Dennis, Mark Rishniw, John P. Loftus, Elsa Beltrán, Olivier Taeymans, Kathleen Graham, Pascaline Pey and Andrew White. Their work appears in journals such as Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound, Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine, Journal of Neuroscience, Frontiers in Neuroanatomy and Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact