Philipp Wesp

979 citations
12 papers · 579 · 1 hit paper · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Philipp Wesp

12 papers receiving 568 citations

Philipp Wesp's Hit Papers

ChatGPT makes medicine easy to swallow: an exploratory case study on simplified radiology reports 2023 · 351 citations
3510+1+2Years since publication100200300

Peers

Philipp Wesp
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Health Informatics 250
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 192
  • Family Practice 11
  • Radiation 52
  • Artificial Intelligence 149
Replace William Shields with:
William Shields United States
K. Elizabeth Hawk United States
Jack Spencer United States
Michael Püsken Germany
R. van den Hoven van Genderen Netherlands
Taiki Nozaki Japan
Reabal Najjar Australia
Charisma Hehakaya Netherlands
Curtise K. C. Ng Australia
Sumeet Hindocha United Kingdom
Philipp Wesp relative to William Shields United States William Shields's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
William Shields · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philipp Wesp

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philipp Wesp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philipp Wesp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philipp Wesp more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philipp Wesp

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philipp Wesp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philipp Wesp. The network helps show where Philipp Wesp may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philipp Wesp, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philipp Wesp Line = papers co-authored together Philipp Wesp links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1
ChatGPT makes medicine easy to swallow: an exploratory case study on simplified radiology reports
Hit paper breakdown →
2023351
2 201959
3 202143
4 202033
5 202124
6 202224
7 201922
8 20255
9 20245
10 20225
11 20244
12 20234

About Philipp Wesp

Philipp Wesp is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Oncology, Radiation and Archeology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 579 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (2 papers), Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry (2 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (2 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (2 papers), COVID-19 diagnosis using AI (2 papers), Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (1 paper), Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes (1 paper) and Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (250 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (192 citations), Family Practice (11 citations), Radiation (52 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (149 citations). Philipp Wesp has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Michael Ingrisch, Jens Ricke, Balthasar Schachtner, Bastian O. Sabel, Katharina Jeblick, Andreas Mittermeier, Jakob Dexl, Tobias Weber, Anna Theresa Stüber and Johanna Topalis. Their work appears in journals such as European Radiology, International Journal of Legal Medicine, Physics in Medicine and Biology, Investigative Radiology and Radiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact