Philipp Stude
Impact in
- Neurology top 5%
- Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
-
- Pain Management and Treatment
Papers in
-
- Migraine and Headache Studies 13
-
- Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies 6
- Co-authors
- Hans‐Christoph Diener (12 shared papers)Katharina Nebel (13 shared papers)Holger Wiese (12 shared papers)Martin Tegenthoff (10 shared papers)M. Keidel (10 shared papers)Armin de Greiff (7 shared papers)Melanie Lenz (5 shared papers)Oliver Höffken (5 shared papers)
- Journals
- The Journal of Headache and Pain (4 papers)Cephalalgia (4 papers)Pain (3 papers)NeuroImage (3 papers)European Journal of Neuroscience (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Philipp Stude
41 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
- Neurology 244
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 152
- Psychiatry and Mental health 391
- Cognitive Neuroscience 470
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 206
Countries citing papers authored by Philipp Stude
This map shows the geographic impact of Philipp Stude's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philipp Stude with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philipp Stude more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philipp Stude
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philipp Stude. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philipp Stude. The network helps show where Philipp Stude may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philipp Stude, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2005 | 117 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 101 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 98 | |
| 4 | 2009 | 94 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 75 | |
| 6 | 2006 | 71 | |
| 7 | 2005 | 58 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 54 | |
| 9 | 2004 | 51 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 50 | |
| 11 | 2004 | 47 | |
| 12 | 2007 | 41 | |
| 13 | 2009 | 41 | |
| 14 | 2003 | 41 | |
| 15 | 2002 | 41 | |
| 16 | 2007 | 31 | |
| 17 | 2004 | 30 | |
| 18 | 2005 | 29 | |
| 19 | 2003 | 27 | |
| 20 | 2016 | 24 |
About Philipp Stude
Philipp Stude is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Neurology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Pharmacology, having authored 42 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Migraine and Headache Studies (13 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (6 papers), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (6 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (5 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (5 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (4 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (4 papers) and Pain Management and Treatment (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (244 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (152 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (391 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (470 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (206 citations). Philipp Stude has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Hans‐Christoph Diener, Katharina Nebel, Holger Wiese, Martin Tegenthoff, M. Keidel, Armin de Greiff, Melanie Lenz, Oliver Höffken, Hubert R. Dinse and Volker Limmroth. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Headache and Pain, Cephalalgia, Pain, NeuroImage and European Journal of Neuroscience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.