Philipp Harfst

484 citations
26 papers · 290 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Philipp Harfst

18 papers receiving 247 citations

Peers

Philipp Harfst
Comparison fields: 5 of 31
  • Political Science and International Relations 245
  • Gender Studies 67
  • Communication 34
  • Strategy and Management 50
  • Public Administration 7
Replace Anna Brigevich with:
Anna Brigevich United States
Lukáš Linek Czechia
Holger Döring Germany
Marc van de Wardt Netherlands
Jürgen Mittag Germany
Gabriella Ilonszki Hungary
Robin E. Best United States
Jean-Louis Thiébault France
Klaus Stolz Germany
Alejandro Ecker Germany
Philipp Harfst relative to Anna Brigevich United States Anna Brigevich's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Anna Brigevich · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philipp Harfst

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philipp Harfst's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philipp Harfst with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philipp Harfst more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philipp Harfst

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philipp Harfst. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philipp Harfst. The network helps show where Philipp Harfst may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Philipp Harfst, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philipp Harfst Line = papers co-authored together Philipp Harfst links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200747
2 201746
3 201744
4 200444
5
Parlamentarische Informations- und Kontrollressourcen in 22 westlichen Demokratien
200531
6 201517
7 20169
8 20229
9 20179
10 20088
11 20136
12 20085
13 20194
14 20183
15 20113
16 20192
17 20241
18 20191
19 20201
20 20230

About Philipp Harfst

Philipp Harfst is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management, Law and Communication, having authored 26 papers that have together received 290 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (13 papers), Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (4 papers), Judicial and Constitutional Studies (3 papers), Social Media and Politics (3 papers), Media Influence and Politics (2 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (2 papers), Populism, Right-Wing Movements (2 papers) and Game Theory and Voting Systems (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (245 citations), Gender Studies (67 citations), Communication (34 citations), Strategy and Management (50 citations) and Public Administration (7 citations). Philipp Harfst has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Ferdinand Müller‐Rommel, Jessica Fortin‐Rittberger, Kai-Uwe Schnapp, Jean‐François Laslier, Karine Van der Straeten, Damien Bol, André Blais, Sona Golder, Laura B. Stephenson and Claudia Wiesner. Their work appears in journals such as Electoral Studies, Frontiers in Political Science, Acta Politica, European Union Politics and Journal of Elections Public Opinion and Parties.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact