Philipp Gölzer

536 citations
12 papers · 415 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Philipp Gölzer

12 papers receiving 393 citations

Peers

Philipp Gölzer
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 199
  • Management Information Systems 154
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 79
  • Strategy and Management 104
  • Management Science and Operations Research 51
Replace Royston Meriton with:
Royston Meriton United Kingdom
Daniel Roy France
Yılmaz Uygun Germany
Danping Lin China
Nikolai Kazantsev United Kingdom
Peter Ohlhausen Germany
Pornthep Anussornnitisarn Thailand
Björn Häckel Germany
Raffaele Secchi Italy
Philipp Gölzer relative to Royston Meriton United Kingdom Royston Meriton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Royston Meriton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philipp Gölzer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philipp Gölzer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philipp Gölzer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philipp Gölzer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philipp Gölzer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philipp Gölzer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philipp Gölzer. The network helps show where Philipp Gölzer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Philipp Gölzer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philipp Gölzer Line = papers co-authored together Philipp Gölzer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 2017221
2 201881
3
Data Processing Requirements of Industry 4.0 - Use Cases for Big Data Applications
201538
4 201532
5 201517
6 20137
7 20217
8 20154
9 20163
10 20152
11 20182
12
Big Data in Industrie 4.0 - Eine strukturierte Aufarbeitung von Anforderungen, Anwendungsfallen und deren Umsetzung
20171

About Philipp Gölzer

Philipp Gölzer is a scholar working on Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Management Information Systems, Management of Technology and Innovation, Management Science and Operations Research and Strategy and Management, having authored 12 papers that have together received 415 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Flexible and Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems (7 papers), Digital Transformation in Industry (7 papers), Big Data and Business Intelligence (6 papers), Digital Innovation in Industries (2 papers), Data Quality and Management (2 papers), Physics and Engineering Research Articles (1 paper), Manufacturing Process and Optimization (1 paper) and Corporate Governance and Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (199 citations), Management Information Systems (154 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (79 citations), Strategy and Management (104 citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (51 citations). Philipp Gölzer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany. Frequent co-authors include Albrecht Fritzsche, Alexander Pflaum, Michael Amberg and Michael Gepp. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Pervasive Computing, Production Planning & Control, wt Werkstattstechnik online, Zeitschrift für wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb and Procedia CIRP.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact