Philip Wander
Impact in
- Philosophy top 0.5%
- Rhetoric and Communication Studies
- Communication top 2%
- Public Relations and Crisis Communication
- Media Studies and Communication
Papers in
-
- Discourse Analysis in Language Studies 7
- Literature, Film, and Journalism Analysis 2
- Narrative Theory and Analysis 2
-
- Rhetoric and Communication Studies 9
- Co-authors
- Henri Lefebvre (3 shared papers)Sacha Rabinovitch (4 shared papers)Richard Morris (1 shared paper)Patrick Brantlinger (1 shared paper)Munir Ravalia (1 shared paper)Henri Lefebvre (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Quarterly Journal of Speech (5 papers)Journal of Communication (4 papers)Western Journal of Communication (2 papers)Social Epistemology (2 papers)Communication Studies (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomIreland
In The Last Decade
Philip Wander
25 papers receiving 579 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- Philosophy 476
- Communication 222
- Literature and Literary Theory 322
- Sociology and Political Science 217
- Gender Studies 40
Countries citing papers authored by Philip Wander
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Wander's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Wander with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Wander more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Wander
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Wander. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Wander. The network helps show where Philip Wander may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside Philip Wander, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1984 | 146 | |
| 2 | 1983 | 131 | |
| 3 | 1984 | 80 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 77 | |
| 5 | 1976 | 59 | |
| 6 | 1992 | 43 | |
| 7 | 1972 | 43 | |
| 8 | 1990 | 42 | |
| 9 | 1996 | 17 | |
| 10 | 1993 | 12 | |
| 11 | 1972 | 10 | |
| 12 | 1983 | 9 | |
| 13 | 2000 | 8 | |
| 14 | 1979 | 8 | |
| 15 | 2016 | 7 | |
| 16 | 1971 | 7 | |
| 17 | 1977 | 7 | |
| 18 | 1971 | 7 | |
| 19 | 2011 | 6 | |
| 20 | 1991 | 5 |
About Philip Wander
Philip Wander is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Philosophy, Communication, Sociology and Political Science and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 28 papers that have together received 731 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Rhetoric and Communication Studies (9 papers), Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (7 papers), Public Relations and Crisis Communication (4 papers), Literature, Film, and Journalism Analysis (2 papers), Narrative Theory and Analysis (2 papers), Race, History, and American Society (2 papers), Media Studies and Communication (2 papers) and Digital Imaging in Medicine (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (476 citations), Communication (222 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (322 citations), Sociology and Political Science (217 citations) and Gender Studies (40 citations). Philip Wander has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Henri Lefebvre, Sacha Rabinovitch, Richard Morris, Patrick Brantlinger, Munir Ravalia and Henri Lefebvre. Their work appears in journals such as Quarterly Journal of Speech, Journal of Communication, Western Journal of Communication, Social Epistemology and Communication Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.