Philip Stott
Impact in
- Ecological Modeling top 5%
- Species Distribution and Climate Change
- Small Animals top 2%
- Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Papers in
- Ecology 23
- Wildlife Ecology and Conservation 17
-
- Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies 8
- Co-authors
- T. C. Whitmore (1 shared paper)Wenfeng Gong (3 shared papers)Guangshun Jiang (7 shared papers)Minghai Zhang (5 shared papers)Yuan Li (1 shared paper)Jianzhang Ma (5 shared papers)Hongxian Yu (2 shared papers)P. Langendijk (6 shared papers)
- Journals
- Reproduction Fertility and Development (3 papers)Mammalian Biology (3 papers)Wildlife Research (3 papers)Journal of Zoology (3 papers)Animal Reproduction Science (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaChinaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Philip Stott
40 papers receiving 950 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
- Ecological Modeling 102
- Small Animals 148
- Ecology 474
- Animal Science and Zoology 107
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 123
Countries citing papers authored by Philip Stott
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Stott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Stott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Stott more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Stott
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Stott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Stott. The network helps show where Philip Stott may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philip Stott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1989 | 252 | |
| 2 | 1998 | 112 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 89 | |
| 4 | 2003 | 46 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 43 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 35 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 34 | |
| 8 | 2002 | 30 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 30 | |
| 10 | 2008 | 28 | |
| 11 | 2012 | 20 | |
| 12 | 1996 | 20 | |
| 13 | 2013 | 20 | |
| 14 | 2010 | 19 | |
| 15 | 2007 | 19 | |
| 16 | 1987 | 18 | |
| 17 | 2011 | 17 | |
| 18 | 2008 | 17 | |
| 19 | 2007 | 17 | |
| 20 | 2011 | 17 |
About Philip Stott
Philip Stott is a scholar working on Ecology, Small Animals, Global and Planetary Change, Animal Science and Zoology and Genetics, having authored 41 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (17 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (8 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (6 papers), Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (6 papers), Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology (5 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (4 papers), Rabbits: Nutrition, Reproduction, Health (4 papers) and Veterinary Equine Medical Research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (102 citations), Small Animals (148 citations), Ecology (474 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (107 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (123 citations). Philip Stott has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, China and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include T. C. Whitmore, Wenfeng Gong, Guangshun Jiang, Minghai Zhang, Yuan Li, Jianzhang Ma, Hongxian Yu, P. Langendijk, E.G. Bouwman and Bing Yu. Their work appears in journals such as Reproduction Fertility and Development, Mammalian Biology, Wildlife Research, Journal of Zoology and Animal Reproduction Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.