Philip Smith

1.8k citations
63 papers · 1.3k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Philip Smith

60 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Philip Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 323
  • Aquatic Science 183
  • Global and Planetary Change 528
  • Ecology 580
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 175
Replace David Jacoby with:
David Jacoby United Kingdom
Robert A. Campbell Australia
John Piccolo Sweden
David N. Carss United Kingdom
William Ewart Gladstone Australia
Joel W. Martin United States
Robert B. Ditton United States
Zoë A. Doubleday Australia
Joseph Heller Israel
Joël M. Durant Norway
Philip Smith relative to David Jacoby United Kingdom David Jacoby's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
David Jacoby · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Smith. The network helps show where Philip Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philip Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philip Smith Line = papers co-authored together Philip Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 63 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005136
2
Punishment and Culture
200893
3 200979
4 199376
5 199472
6 199559
7 199359
8 199953
9 199851
10 199447
11 200144
12 200732
13 200830
14 199529
15 199728
16 200827
17 200825
18 201022
19 200019
20 199717

About Philip Smith

Philip Smith is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Aquatic Science and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 63 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Marine and fisheries research (22 papers), Crustacean biology and ecology (13 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (11 papers), Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies (11 papers), Fish biology, ecology, and behavior (8 papers), Fish Biology and Ecology Studies (5 papers), Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth (3 papers) and Animal Behavior and Reproduction (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (323 citations), Aquatic Science (183 citations), Global and Planetary Change (528 citations), Ecology (580 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (175 citations). Philip Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include A. C. Taylor, Felicity A. Huntingford, Ken Collins, Thomas Claverie, Gordon W. Smith, Neil B. Metcalfe, A.C. Jensen, Roger Atkinson, Antony Jensen and Sunil Kadri. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Fish Biology, Marine Ecology Progress Series, Aquaculture, Marine Biology and Animal Behaviour.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact