Philip Shepherd

581 citations
8 papers · 501 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Philip Shepherd

8 papers receiving 488 citations

Peers

Philip Shepherd
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 313
  • Materials Chemistry 366
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 31
  • Organic Chemistry 120
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 48
Replace Hung H. Pham with:
Hung H. Pham Canada
Alfons Becker Germany
Agnieszka Chrzanowska Poland
Yogesh Kumar India
Yusuke Tanaka Japan
Kengqing Jian United States
Jeffrey Bodycomb Japan
Kasper Masschaele Belgium
M.N. Desai India
Ibrahim Bou Malham France
Philip Shepherd relative to Hung H. Pham Canada Hung H. Pham's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.1×
Hung H. Pham · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Shepherd

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Shepherd's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Shepherd with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Shepherd more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Shepherd

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Shepherd. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Shepherd. The network helps show where Philip Shepherd may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Philip Shepherd, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philip Shepherd Line = papers co-authored together Philip Shepherd links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown

About Philip Shepherd

Philip Shepherd is a scholar working on Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Materials Chemistry, Biomedical Engineering, Condensed Matter Physics and Organic Chemistry, having authored 8 papers that have together received 501 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic Properties and Synthesis of Ferrites (4 papers), Electromagnetic wave absorption materials (4 papers), Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles (3 papers), Theoretical and Computational Physics (2 papers), Multiferroics and related materials (2 papers), Magnetic Properties and Applications (2 papers), Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies (1 paper) and Surfactants and Colloidal Systems (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (313 citations), Materials Chemistry (366 citations), Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (31 citations), Organic Chemistry (120 citations) and Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (48 citations). Philip Shepherd has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Roger J. Green, Kajal K. Mallick, Richard Buscall, Rammile Ettelaie, Tom Annable, J. Popplewell and S.W. Charles. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, Journal of Physics D Applied Physics, Journal of the European Ceramic Society, Journal of Materials Science Materials in Electronics and Langmuir.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact