Philip Oris
Impact in
- Automotive Engineering top 5%
- Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
- Biomedical Engineering top 10%
- Anatomy and Medical Technology
Papers in
-
- Anatomy and Medical Technology 8
-
- Elbow and Forearm Trauma Treatment 2
- Co-authors
- Erik L.J. Bohez (7 shared papers)Jos Vander Sloten (6 shared papers)Banchong Mahaisavariya (6 shared papers)Kriskrai Sitthiseripratip (6 shared papers)Trongtum Tongdee (4 shared papers)Huynh Ngoc Phien (3 shared papers)Jintamai Suwanprateeb (2 shared papers)Hans Van Oosterwyck (2 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Philip Oris
11 papers receiving 463 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Automotive Engineering 76
- Biomedical Engineering 202
- Surgery 179
- Rehabilitation 21
- Computational Mathematics 2
Countries citing papers authored by Philip Oris
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Oris's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Oris with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Oris more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Oris
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Oris. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Oris. The network helps show where Philip Oris may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 15 scholars most cited alongside Philip Oris, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2002 | 130 | |
| 2 | 2005 | 110 | |
| 3 | 2003 | 73 | |
| 4 | 2003 | 72 | |
| 5 | 2002 | 35 | |
| 6 | 2005 | 29 | |
| 7 | 2004 | 25 | |
| 8 | 2003 | 12 | |
| 9 | Fit-and-fill analysis of trochanteric gamma nail for the Thai proximal femur: a virtual simulation study. | 2004 | 11 |
| 10 | The use of microfocus computerized tomography as a new technique to characterize bone tissue around oral implants | 1999 | 4 |
| 11 | Morphological study of the Thai proximal femur: a new method of geometrical assessment using 3-dimensional reverse engineering | 2002 | 2 |
About Philip Oris
Philip Oris is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Rehabilitation, Surgery, Oral Surgery and Automotive Engineering, having authored 11 papers that have together received 503 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anatomy and Medical Technology (8 papers), Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (4 papers), Elbow and Forearm Trauma Treatment (2 papers), Morphological variations and asymmetry (1 paper), Hip disorders and treatments (1 paper), Bone fractures and treatments (1 paper), Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes (1 paper) and Hip and Femur Fractures (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Automotive Engineering (76 citations), Biomedical Engineering (202 citations), Surgery (179 citations), Rehabilitation (21 citations) and Computational Mathematics (2 citations). Philip Oris has collaborated with scholars based in Thailand, Belgium and Bulgaria. Frequent co-authors include Erik L.J. Bohez, Jos Vander Sloten, Banchong Mahaisavariya, Kriskrai Sitthiseripratip, Trongtum Tongdee, Huynh Ngoc Phien, Jintamai Suwanprateeb, Hans Van Oosterwyck, Remi Van Audekercke and Jos Vander Sloten. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part H Journal of Engineering in Medicine, Assembly Automation, Rapid Prototyping Journal, Medical Engineering & Physics and Technology and Health Care.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.