Philip King

2.1k citations
90 papers · 1.7k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Philip King

86 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Philip King
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Structural Biology 91
  • Condensed Matter Physics 575
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 449
  • Radiation 172
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films 116
Replace С. Л. Молодцов with:
С. Л. Молодцов Germany
Akito Kakizaki Japan
L. Niesen Netherlands
P. A. Doyle Australia
G. D. Waddill United States
J. F. Wendelken United States
R. Pinchaux France
M. Donath Germany
B. D. Hermsmeier United States
W. Schattke Germany
Philip King relative to С. Л. Молодцов Germany С. Л. Молодцов's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
С. Л. Молодцов · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip King

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip King

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip King. The network helps show where Philip King may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philip King, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philip King Line = papers co-authored together Philip King links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 90 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001370
2
Materials Analysis Using a Nuclear Microprobe
1996202
3 200678
4 199260
5 201351
6 199851
7 201450
8 201541
9 199440
10 200438
11 200032
12 200928
13 199825
14 199224
15 200324
16 199623
17 201323
18 201123
19 199521
20 200720

About Philip King

Philip King is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Mechanics of Materials, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Computational Mechanics and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 90 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Muon and positron interactions and applications (22 papers), Ion-surface interactions and analysis (16 papers), Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (13 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (13 papers), Crystallography and Radiation Phenomena (12 papers), Organometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis (11 papers), Integrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis (10 papers) and Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Structural Biology (91 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (575 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (449 citations), Radiation (172 citations) and Surfaces, Coatings and Films (116 citations). Philip King has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Switzerland and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Mark B. H. Breese, David N. Jamieson, Stephen P. Cottrell, G.W. Grime, J. S. Lord, S.F.J. Cox, R. L. Lichti, S.J.C. Irvine, R. C. Vilão and H. V. Alberto. Their work appears in journals such as Physica B Condensed Matter, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, Physical Review Letters, Physical review. B, Condensed matter and Applied Physics Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact