Philip King

2.2k citations
97 papers · 1.8k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Philip King

91 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Philip King
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Structural Biology 91
  • Condensed Matter Physics 591
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 468
  • Radiation 174
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films 118
Replace Tsuneaki Miyahara with:
Tsuneaki Miyahara Japan
С. Л. Молодцов Germany
L. Niesen Netherlands
Akito Kakizaki Japan
George D. Waddill United States
John F. Wendelken United States
Robert Pinchaux France
M. Donath Germany
B. D. Hermsmeier United States
W. Schattke Germany
Philip King relative to Tsuneaki Miyahara Japan Tsuneaki Miyahara's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Tsuneaki Miyahara · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip King

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip King

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip King. The network helps show where Philip King may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philip King, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philip King Line = papers co-authored together Philip King links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 97 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001392
2
Materials Analysis Using a Nuclear Microprobe
1996210
3 200681
4 199260
5 199852
6 201451
7 201350
8 201545
9 199442
10 200439
11 200033
12 200929
13 199828
14 200326
15 201126
16 199625
17 199224
18 201323
19 199522
20 200019

About Philip King

Philip King is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Mechanics of Materials, Radiation, Computational Mechanics and Structural Biology, having authored 97 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Muon and positron interactions and applications (23 papers), Ion-surface interactions and analysis (16 papers), Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (13 papers), Organometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis (13 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (13 papers), Crystallography and Radiation Phenomena (12 papers), Integrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis (10 papers) and Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Structural Biology (91 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (591 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (468 citations), Radiation (174 citations) and Surfaces, Coatings and Films (118 citations). Philip King has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Switzerland and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Mark B. H. Breese, David N. Jamieson, Stephen P. Cottrell, G.W. Grime, James S. Lord, H. V. Alberto, N. Ayres de Campos, E. A. Davis, J. Piroto Duarte and S.J.C. Irvine. Their work appears in journals such as Physica B Condensed Matter, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, Physical Review Letters, Applied Physics Letters and Physical Review B.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact