Philip Keller

707 citations
43 papers · 591 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Philip Keller

41 papers receiving 556 citations

Peers

Philip Keller
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 274
  • Automotive Engineering 155
  • Computational Mechanics 210
  • Aerospace Engineering 171
  • Mechanical Engineering 118
Replace Omar Mohamed with:
Omar Mohamed Jordan
Kavindu Ranasinghe Australia
Mineo Fukushima Japan
R. Mohanraj India
Donghoon Lee South Korea
Tianyu Chen China
Heinz P. Bloch
Wolfgang Gawlik Austria
Wenhua Yang China
Philip Keller relative to Omar Mohamed Jordan Omar Mohamed's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.3×
Omar Mohamed · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Keller

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Keller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Keller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Keller more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Keller

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Keller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Keller. The network helps show where Philip Keller may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philip Keller, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philip Keller Line = papers co-authored together Philip Keller links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017112
2 201330
3 201029
4 201326
5 201025
6 201022
7 200320
8 200820
9 202118
10 201117
11 199317
12 199316
13 201615
14 200715
15 200815
16 201415
17 199714
18 200814
19 201112
20 199511

About Philip Keller

Philip Keller is a scholar working on Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes, Automotive Engineering, Computational Mechanics, Aerospace Engineering and Mechanical Engineering, having authored 43 papers that have together received 591 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies (19 papers), Combustion and flame dynamics (11 papers), Vehicle emissions and performance (9 papers), Turbomachinery Performance and Optimization (9 papers), Biodiesel Production and Applications (5 papers), Electric and Hybrid Vehicle Technologies (4 papers), Advanced Battery Technologies Research (3 papers) and Aerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (274 citations), Automotive Engineering (155 citations), Computational Mechanics (210 citations), Aerospace Engineering (171 citations) and Mechanical Engineering (118 citations). Philip Keller has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Brazil and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Michael Becker, M. Elisabeth Paté‐Cornell, Ahmet Selamet, David B. Roth, Harold Schock, Michael Becker, Bo Yang, Martin Tunér, Bengt Johansson and James C. Sisson. Their work appears in journals such as SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series, SAE International Journal of Engines, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, Journal of Turbomachinery and Risk Analysis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact