Philip Esterhuizen

21 papers receiving 334 citations

Peers

Philip Esterhuizen
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 131
  • Research and Theory 11
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 5
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 18
  • Leadership and Management 5
Replace Nancy Bol with:
Nancy Bol Canada
Irena Madjar Australia
Rolanda Johnson United States
Jane Gibbins United Kingdom
Alexie Cintron United States
Reena Lasrado United Kingdom
Chiara Mastroianni Italy
Amalia Sillero Sillero Spain
Jacqueline Ellis Canada
Rosalie O. Mainous United States
Philip Esterhuizen relative to Nancy Bol Canada Nancy Bol's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×
Nancy Bol · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Esterhuizen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Esterhuizen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Esterhuizen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Esterhuizen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Esterhuizen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Esterhuizen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Esterhuizen. The network helps show where Philip Esterhuizen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philip Esterhuizen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philip Esterhuizen Line = papers co-authored together Philip Esterhuizen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014198
2 199650
3 201625
4 201217
5 201510
6 20068
7 20148
8 20018
9 20176
10 20105
11 20164
12 20093
13 20093
14
Educating leaders for global health care
20093
15 20141
16 20171
17 20091
18 20171
19 20201
20
A Delphi Study: Towards a clear definition an operationalization of 'inclusive leadership' (in a global context?)
20151

About Philip Esterhuizen

Philip Esterhuizen is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Psychiatry and Mental health and Education, having authored 24 papers that have together received 355 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in medical practice (5 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (4 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (3 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (3 papers), Nursing education and management (2 papers), Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership (2 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (2 papers) and Cultural Competency in Health Care (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (131 citations), Research and Theory (11 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (5 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (18 citations) and Leadership and Management (5 citations). Philip Esterhuizen has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include Dawn Dowding, Anne Corbett, Valentina Lichtner, Andrew Long, Michelle Briggs, S. José Closs, Mary K. Kirkpatrick, Dawn Freshwater, Jane Cahill and Tessa Muncey. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of research in nursing, Journal of Advanced Nursing, Qualitative Health Research, BMC Geriatrics and Nursing Philosophy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact