Philip E. Miller

53 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

Philip E. Miller
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Signal Processing 529
  • Computational Mechanics 778
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 509
  • Ceramics and Composites 124
  • Biomedical Engineering 793
Replace Zhigang Fan with:
Zhigang Fan China
Xiaofeng Wei China
Kevin P. Chen United States
Zhipeng Wei China
Xingsheng Liu China
Tadahiro Ohmi Japan
Matthew J. Smith United States
Yuejin Zhao China
Vadim P. Veiko Russia
Tingyun Wang China
Philip E. Miller relative to Zhigang Fan China Zhigang Fan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×12.0×
Zhigang Fan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip E. Miller

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip E. Miller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip E. Miller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip E. Miller more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip E. Miller

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip E. Miller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip E. Miller. The network helps show where Philip E. Miller may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philip E. Miller, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philip E. Miller Line = papers co-authored together Philip E. Miller links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006233
2 2014157
3 2010147
4 2010116
5 2009105
6 200286
7 201084
8 201081
9 198670
10 201070
11 201568
12 201068
13 201161
14 201057
15 201350
16 200544
17 201438
18 201633
19 201433
20 201232

About Philip E. Miller

Philip E. Miller is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Signal Processing, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Computational Mechanics and Mechanics of Materials, having authored 55 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biometric Identification and Security (13 papers), Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques (12 papers), Laser Material Processing Techniques (11 papers), Face recognition and analysis (9 papers), Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (8 papers), Face and Expression Recognition (7 papers), Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research (5 papers) and Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Signal Processing (529 citations), Computational Mechanics (778 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (509 citations), Ceramics and Composites (124 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (793 citations). Philip E. Miller has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Damon L. Woodard, Tayyab I. Suratwala, Shrinivas Pundlik, Lana L. Wong, William A. Steele, Nan Shen, Michael D. Feit, J. Menapace, Ted A. Laurence and M. Bonner Denton. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Ceramic Society, Journal of Materials Science, Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, Optics Express and Colloids and Surfaces A Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact