J. Menapace

4.3k citations
42 papers · 1.8k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

J. Menapace

40 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

J. Menapace
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Computational Mechanics 1.0k
  • Biomedical Engineering 1.1k
  • Ceramics and Composites 104
  • Mechanics of Materials 385
  • Ophthalmology 112
Replace Christopher J. Stolz with:
Christopher J. Stolz United States
Phil Miller United States
Mark R. Kozlowski United States
E.W. Kreutz Germany
Yuanan Zhao China
Tomokazu Sano Japan
Paulius Gečys Lithuania
Philippe Cormont France
Isamu Miyamoto Japan
Hamit Kalaycıoğlu Türkiye
J. Menapace relative to Christopher J. Stolz United States Christopher J. Stolz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Christopher J. Stolz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. Menapace

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Menapace's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Menapace with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Menapace more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Menapace

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Menapace. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Menapace. The network helps show where J. Menapace may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside J. Menapace, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J. Menapace Line = papers co-authored together J. Menapace links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004242
2 2006238
3 2016192
4 2010148
5 2005130
6 2008122
7 200892
8 200288
9 200478
10 200972
11 200946
12 200544
13 200229
14 200427
15 200627
16 201026
17 200223
18 200822
19 201716
20 201715

About J. Menapace

J. Menapace is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Computational Mechanics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Mechanics of Materials and Mechanical Engineering, having authored 42 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques (27 papers), Laser Material Processing Techniques (20 papers), Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (8 papers), Laser Design and Applications (8 papers), Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research (8 papers), Solid State Laser Technologies (8 papers), Advanced machining processes and optimization (8 papers) and Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Mechanics (1.0k citations), Biomedical Engineering (1.1k citations), Ceramics and Composites (104 citations), Mechanics of Materials (385 citations) and Ophthalmology (112 citations). J. Menapace has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Lana L. Wong, Tayyab I. Suratwala, Michael D. Feit, Pete Davis, R. Steele, Philip E. Miller, Phil Miller, Christopher J. Stolz, Michael J. Runkel and William A. Steele. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Optics, Fusion Science & Technology, Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, Langmuir and Colloids and Surfaces A Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact