Philip E. McClain

646 citations
27 papers · 577 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Philip E. McClain

26 papers receiving 495 citations

Peers

Philip E. McClain
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Biomaterials 176
  • Animal Science and Zoology 119
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 56
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 116
  • Equine 8
Replace Shaoyan Si with:
Shaoyan Si China
Neil Emmison United Kingdom
J. B. O'Driscoll United Kingdom
Ja Seong Koo South Korea
Yasuhiro Toba Japan
Shabnam Abdi Iran
Deepika Sharma India
Philip H. Long United States
Effat Omar Malaysia
Cinzia Callà Italy
Philip E. McClain relative to Shaoyan Si China Shaoyan Si's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.3×
Shaoyan Si · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip E. McClain

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip E. McClain's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip E. McClain with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip E. McClain more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip E. McClain

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip E. McClain. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip E. McClain. The network helps show where Philip E. McClain may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philip E. McClain, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philip E. McClain Line = papers co-authored together Philip E. McClain links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1972114
2 198186
3 197755
4 197348
5 197440
6 196935
7 197821
8 196519
9 196817
10 197016
11 197116
12
The weight of normal thyroid glands in children.
196614
13 196912
14 197211
15 197711
16 196510
17 19699
18 19698
19 19716
20 19736

About Philip E. McClain

Philip E. McClain is a scholar working on Biomaterials, Molecular Biology, Animal Science and Zoology, Rheumatology and Surgery, having authored 27 papers that have together received 577 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Collagen: Extraction and Characterization (15 papers), Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms (5 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (5 papers), Tendon Structure and Treatment (3 papers), Cell Adhesion Molecules Research (3 papers), Silk-based biomaterials and applications (2 papers), Urological Disorders and Treatments (2 papers) and Child Nutrition and Water Access (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biomaterials (176 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (119 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (56 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (116 citations) and Equine (8 citations). Philip E. McClain has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Eugene R. Wiley, J. Paul Costiloe, Warren M. Crosby, Jack Metcoff, H H Sandstead, C. E. Bodwell, A. M. Pearson, Gary R. Beecher, Frances M. Weaver and Larry A. Bentle. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Animal Science, Experimental Biology and Medicine, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition and Journal of Biological Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact